Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30361823›Full record

Observational studyJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2019

Evaluation of cardiac output variations with the peripheral pulse pressure to mean arterial pressure ratio.

Audrey Tantot, Anais Caillard, Arthur Le Gall, Joaquim Mateo, Sandrine Millasseau, Alexandre Mebazaa, Etienne Gayat, Fabrice Vallée

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Entropy Information of Pulse Dynamics in Three Stages of Pregnancy.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Audrey TantotDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Saint-Louis-Lariboisière, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Diderot, 2 rue Ambroise-Paris, 75475, Paris Cedex 10, France. audrey.tantot@wanadoo.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6325-9499
Anais CaillardDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Saint-Louis-Lariboisière, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Diderot, 2 rue Ambroise-Paris, 75475, Paris Cedex 10, France.
Arthur Le GallDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Saint-Louis-Lariboisière, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Diderot, 2 rue Ambroise-Paris, 75475, Paris Cedex 10, France.
Joaquim MateoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Saint-Louis-Lariboisière, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Diderot, 2 rue Ambroise-Paris, 75475, Paris Cedex 10, France.
Sandrine MillasseauPulse Wave Consulting, Saint Leu La Foret, France.
Alexandre MebazaaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Saint-Louis-Lariboisière, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Diderot, 2 rue Ambroise-Paris, 75475, Paris Cedex 10, France.
Etienne GayatDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Saint-Louis-Lariboisière, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Diderot, 2 rue Ambroise-Paris, 75475, Paris Cedex 10, France.
Fabrice ValléeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Saint-Louis-Lariboisière, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Diderot, 2 rue Ambroise-Paris, 75475, Paris Cedex 10, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8204-3626
Inserm · FRÉcole Polytechnique · FRDélégation Paris 7 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac output (CO) optimisation during surgery reduces post-operative morbidity. Various methods based on pulse pressure analysis have been developed to overcome difficulties to measure accurate CO variations in standard anaesthetic settings. Several of these methods include, among other parameters, the ratio of pulse pressure to mean arterial pressure (PP/MAP). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the ratio of radial pulse pressure to mean arterial pressure (ΔPPrad/MAP) could track CO variations (ΔCO) induced by various therapeutic interventions such as fluid infusions and vasopressors boluses [phenylephrine (PE), norepinephrine (NA) or ephedrine (EP)] in the operating room. Trans-oesophageal Doppler signal and pressure waveforms were recorded in patients undergoing neurosurgery. CO and PPrad/MAP were recorded before and after fluid challenges, PE, NA and EP bolus infusions as medically required during their anaesthesia. One hundred and three patients (mean age: 52 ± 12 years old, 38 men) have been included with a total of 636 sets of measurement. During fluids challenges (n = 188), a positive correlation was found between ΔPPrad/MAP and ΔCO (r = 0.22, p = 0.003). After PE (n = 256) and NA (n = 121) boluses, ΔPPrad/MAP positively tracked ΔCO (r = 0.53 and 0.41 respectively, p < 0.001). By contrast, there was no relation between ΔPPrad/MAP and ΔCO after EP boluses (r = 0.10, p = 0.39). ΔPPrad/MAP tracked ΔCO variations during PE and NA vasopressor challenges. However, after positive fluid challenge or EP boluses, ΔPPrad/MAP was not as performant to track ΔCO which could make the use of this ratio difficult in current clinical practice.

Indexed as

Arterial PressureBlood PressureCardiac OutputAdultAgedAnesthesiaEphedrineFemaleHeart RateHemodynamicsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, PhysiologicNeurosurgical ProceduresNorepinephrineEphedrineNorepinephrinePhenylephrineVasoconstrictor AgentsCardiac outputMean arterial pressurePP/MAPPressure pulse analysisPulse pressureVasopressor challenges

Identifiers

PMID30361823
OpenAlexW2898311812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.