Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30361819›Full record

ReviewClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2019

Recommendations for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR): consensus statement of DGIIN, DGK, DGTHG, DGfK, DGNI, DGAI, DIVI and GRC.

Guido Michels, Tobias Wengenmayer, Christian Hagl, Christian Dohmen, Bernd W Böttiger, Johann Bauersachs, Andreas Markewitz, Adrian Bauer, Jan-Thorsten Gräsner, Roman Pfister and 14 more

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. [Open questions with respect to extracorporeal circulatory support 2024].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2024
    Review
  18. [Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation-An orientation].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in 2023.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 16 institutions in 1 country.

Guido MichelsDepartment III of Internal Medicine, Heart Centre of the University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany. guido.michels@uk-koeln.de.
Tobias WengenmayerDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology I, Heart Center Freiburg University, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Christian HaglDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Christian DohmenLVR-Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Bernd W BöttigerDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Johann BauersachsDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Andreas Markewitz, Bendorf, Germany.
Adrian BauerDepartment of Cardiovascular Perfusion, MediClin Heart Center Coswig, Coswig, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany.
Jan-Thorsten GräsnerInstitute for Emergency Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Roman PfisterDepartment III of Internal Medicine, Heart Centre of the University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Alexander GhanemDepartment of Cardiology, Asklepios Klinik St Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
Hans-Jörg BuschDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University Hospital of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Uwe KreimeierDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Andreas BeckmannDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Centre Duisburg, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Niederrhein, Duisburg, Germany.
Matthias FischerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Pain Service, Hospital Am Eichert, Alb Fils Kliniken GmbH, Goeppingen, Germany.
Clemens KillCentre of Emergency Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Uwe JanssensDepartment of Internal Medicine and Intensive Care Medicine, St. Antonius Hospital Eschweiler, Eschweiler, Germany.
Stefan KlugeDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Frank BornDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Hans Martin HoffmeisterDepartment of Cardiology and General Internal Medicine, Städtisches Klinikum Solingen gGmbH, Solingen, Germany.
Michael PreuschDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Udo BoekenDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Reimer RiessenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medical Intensive Care Unit, University of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Holger ThieleDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig, University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany.
Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin · DEGerman Cardiac Society · DEDeutsche Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin · DEGerman Society of Medical Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity of Cologne · DEAsklepios Klinik St. Georg · DEGerman Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery · DEHeidelberg University · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DELVR-Klinik Bonn · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEStädtisches Klinikum Solingen · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) may be considered as a rescue attempt for highly selected patients with refractory cardiac arrest and potentially reversible aetiology. Currently, there are no randomised, controlled studies on eCPR. Thus, prospective validated predictors of benefit and outcome are lacking. Currently, selection criteria and procedure techniques differ across hospitals and standardised algorithms are lacking. Based on expert opinion, the present consensus statement provides a first standardised treatment algorithm for eCPR.

Indexed as

ConsensusPatient SelectionCardiopulmonary ResuscitationExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationHumansOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestCardiac arrestCardiogenic shockExtracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitationExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationResuscitation

Identifiers

PMID30361819
OpenAlexW2891044788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.