ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2019
[Multivisceral resection with and without HIPEC in cancer surgery].
Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMultivisceral resections seem to be naturally associated with an elevated morbidity rate. Data regarding the impact of multivisceral resections on progression-free and overall survival are only available in insufficient quantities.
objectiveData on multivisceral resections in cancer surgery are presented exemplified by gastric cancer, colorectal cancer and peritoneal metastases, focusing on overall and progression-free survival as well as morbidity and mortality. MATERIAL AND
methodsA PubMed search was carried out including the following terms: multivisceral resection, peritoneal metastases, cytoreduction, morbidity, HIPEC (hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy)
resultsMultivisceral resections should only be performed if an R0 status can be achieved for all tumor entities. Preoperative performance of an FDG-PET-CT scan (fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography scan) can help in the selection of appropriate patients. In gastric cancer, extensive lymphatic metastases are associated with a poor overall survival despite multivisceral resection. Recurrent rectal cancer shows elevated morbidity rates and also decreased overall survival rates. Maximum cytoreductive surgery can be conducted for peritoneal metastasized appendiceal neoplasms and colorectal cancer with acceptable morbidity and without an increased risk for reduced overall survival.
conclusionAfter adequate patient selection and exclusion of stage IV distant metastatic disease, multivisceral resections can be offered to patients with the goal of an R0 resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30361743What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.