Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30361649›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Nanogel tectonic porous 3D scaffold for direct reprogramming fibroblasts into osteoblasts and bone regeneration.

Yoshiki Sato, Kenta Yamamoto, Satoshi Horiguchi, Yoshiro Tahara, Kei Nakai, Shin-Ichiro Kotani, Fumishige Oseko, Giuseppe Pezzotti, Toshiro Yamamoto, Tsunao Kishida and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Multiscale Construction, Evaluation, and Application of Organoids.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yoshiki SatoDepartment of Immunology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Kenta YamamotoDepartment of Immunology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Satoshi HoriguchiDepartment of Immunology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Yoshiro TaharaDepartment of Polymer Chemistry, Graduate school of engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Kei NakaiDepartment of Immunology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Shin-Ichiro KotaniDepartment of Immunology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Fumishige OsekoDepartment of Dental Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Giuseppe PezzottiDepartment of Immunology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Toshiro YamamotoDepartment of Dental Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Tsunao KishidaDepartment of Immunology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Narisato KanamuraDepartment of Dental Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Kazunari AkiyoshiDepartment of Polymer Chemistry, Graduate school of engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. akiyoshi@bio.polym.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Osam MazdaDepartment of Immunology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan. mazda@koto.kpu-m.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9489-3556

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transplantation of engineered three-dimensional (3D) bone tissue may provide therapeutic benefits to patients with various bone diseases. To achieve this goal, appropriate 3D scaffolds and cells are required. In the present study, we devised a novel nanogel tectonic material for artificial 3D scaffold, namely the nanogel-cross-linked porous (NanoCliP)-freeze-dried (FD) gel, and estimated its potential as a 3D scaffold for bone tissue engineering. As the osteoblasts, directly converted osteoblasts (dOBs) were used, because a large number of highly functional osteoblasts could be induced from fibroblasts that can be collected from patients with a minimally invasive procedure. The NanoCliP-FD gel was highly porous, and fibronectin coating of the gel allowed efficient adhesion of the dOBs, so that the cells occupied the almost entire surface of the walls of the pores after culturing for 7 days. The dOBs massively produced calcified bone matrix, and the culture could be continued for at least 28 days. The NanoCliP-FD gel with dOBs remarkably promoted bone regeneration in vivo after having been grafted to bone defect lesions that were artificially created in mice. The present findings suggest that the combination of the NanoCliP-FD gel and dOBs may provide a feasible therapeutic modality for bone diseases.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone MatrixBone RegenerationCell AdhesionCell ProliferationCellular ReprogrammingCross-Linking ReagentsFibroblastsFibronectinsFreeze DryingHumansMiceNanogelsOsteoblastsPolyethylene GlycolsPolyethyleneimineCross-Linking ReagentsFibronectinsNanogelspolyethylene glycol polyethyleneimine nanogelPolyethylene GlycolsPolyethyleneimine

Identifiers

PMID30361649
PMCPMC6202359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.