ArticleNature medicine2018
Publisher Correction: Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in high-risk resectable melanoma.
Article in Nature medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of melanoma, version 3.0.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2023Guideline
- Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors in high-risk stage III melanoma.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2022Review
- Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for resectable esophageal cancer: A review.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Multiplexed digital spatial profiling of invasive breast tumors from Black and White women.Molecular oncology · 2022Article
- Immunotherapy for Neuro-oncology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021Review
- Burden of tumor mutations, neoepitopes, and other variants are weak predictors of cancer immunotherapy response and overall survival.Genome medicine · 2020Article
- Neoadjuvant therapy of locally/regionally advanced melanoma.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2019Review
- New window of opportunity with ICIs in melanoma.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
45 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the version of this article originally published, there was an error in Fig. 1. In the neoadjuvant phase column, the n values for arms A and B were both reported to be 20. The n values for arms A and B were actually 12 and 11, respectively. Also, the URL underlying the accession code in the data availability section was incorrect. The URL was originally https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ega/studies/EGAS00001002698. It should have been https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ega/studies/EGAS00001003178. The errors have been corrected in the print, HTML and PDF versions of this article.
Identifiers
30361511What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.