Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30361502›Full record

ArticleNPJ schizophrenia2018

Efficacy of different types of cognitive enhancers for patients with schizophrenia: a meta-analysis.

Igne Sinkeviciute, Marieke Begemann, Merel Prikken, Bob Oranje, Erik Johnsen, Wan U Lei, Kenneth Hugdahl, Rune A Kroken, Carina Rau, Jolien D Jacobs and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ schizophrenia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. The effects of eszopiclone on sleep spindles and memory consolidation in schizophrenia: a randomized clinical trial.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Igne SinkeviciuteDivision of Psychiatry, Haukeland University Hospital, PB 1400, 5021, Bergen, Norway. igne.sinkeviciute@helse-bergen.no.
Marieke BegemannRijks Universiteit Groningen (RUG), University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Neuroscience and Department of Psychiatry, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Merel PrikkenBrain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Bob OranjeBrain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Erik JohnsenDivision of Psychiatry, Haukeland University Hospital, PB 1400, 5021, Bergen, Norway.
Wan U LeiSchool of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Kenneth HugdahlDivision of Psychiatry, Haukeland University Hospital, PB 1400, 5021, Bergen, Norway.
Rune A KrokenDivision of Psychiatry, Haukeland University Hospital, PB 1400, 5021, Bergen, Norway.
Carina RauDepartment of Chemistry, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Jolien D JacobsDepartment Graduate School of Life Science, Faculty of Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Silvia MattarocciaDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Iris E SommerRijks Universiteit Groningen (RUG), University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Neuroscience and Department of Psychiatry, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Haukeland University Hospital · NOUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Bergen · NOSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Konstanz · DEUniversity of Oslo · NOUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive impairment is a core feature of schizophrenia, which is predictive for functional outcomes and is, therefore, a treatment target in itself. Yet, literature on efficacy of different pharmaco-therapeutic options is inconsistent. This quantitative review provides an overview of studies that investigated potential cognitive enhancers in schizophrenia. We included pharmacological agents, which target different neurotransmitter systems and evaluated their efficacy on overall cognitive functioning and seven separate cognitive domains. In total, 93 studies with 5630 patients were included. Cognitive enhancers, when combined across all different neurotransmitter systems, which act on a large number of different mechanisms, showed a significant (yet small) positive effect size of 0.10 (k = 51, p = 0.023; 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.18) on overall cognition. Cognitive enhancers were not superior to placebo for separate cognitive domains. When analyzing each neurotransmitter system separately, agents acting predominantly on the glutamatergic system showed a small significant effect on overall cognition (k = 29, Hedges' g = 0.19, p = 0.01), as well as on working memory (k = 20, Hedges' g = 0.13, p = 0.04). A sub-analysis of cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEI) showed a small effect on working memory (k = 6, Hedges' g = 0.26, p = 0.03). Other sub-analyses were positively nonsignificant, which may partly be due to the low number of studies we could include per neurotransmitter system. Overall, this meta-analysis showed few favorable effects of cognitive enhancers for patients with schizophrenia, partly due to lack of power. There is a lack of studies involving agents acting on other than glutamatergic and cholinergic systems, especially of those targeting the dopaminergic system.

Identifiers

PMID30361502
PMCPMC6202388
OpenAlexW2894699360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.