Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30361422›Full record

Trial reportThe oncologist2019

Phase II Trial of 5-Fluorouracil, Docetaxel, and Nedaplatin (UDON) Combination Therapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Esophageal Cancer.

Hiroto Ueda, Hisato Kawakami, Yoshikane Nonagase, Naoki Takegawa, Tatsuya Okuno, Takayuki Takahama, Masayuki Takeda, Yasutaka Chiba, Takao Tamura, Kazuhiko Nakagawa

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in The oncologist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Molecular mechanisms associated with chemoresistance in esophageal cancer.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroto UedaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Hisato KawakamiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan kawakami_h@med.kindai.ac.jp.
Yoshikane NonagaseDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Naoki TakegawaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Tatsuya OkunoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Takayuki TakahamaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Masayuki TakedaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Yasutaka ChibaClinical Research Center, Kindai University Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Takao TamuraDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Kazuhiko NakagawaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Kindai University · JPKindai University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

lessons learnedThe 5-fluorouracil, docetaxel, and nedaplatin (UDON) regimen was well tolerated and showed promising antitumor activity in terms of both objective response rate and survival for patients with advanced or recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the first-line setting.UDON may be an optimal treatment option for patients with advanced esophageal cancer who are unfit for docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil regimens.The high response rate as well as the rapid and marked tumor shrinkage associated with UDON suggest that further evaluation of this regimen in the neoadjuvant setting is warranted.

backgroundA phase II study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), docetaxel, and nedaplatin (UDON) combination therapy for untreated recurrent or metastatic esophageal cancer.

methodsPatients received intravenous nedaplatin (90 mg/m

resultsBetween March 2015 and July 2017, 23 patients were enrolled. Of 22 evaluable patients, 16 and 4 individuals experienced a partial response and stable disease, respectively, yielding a response rate of 72.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.8%-89.3%) and disease control rate of 90.9% (95% CI, 70.8%-98.9%). Median OS and PFS were 11.2 months (95% CI, 9.1 months to not reached) and 6.0 months (95% CI, 2.5-10.6 months), respectively. Eleven (64.7%) of the 17 patients with a primary lesion showed amelioration of dysphagia after treatment. Frequent adverse events of grade 3 or 4 included neutropenia (87.0%) and leukopenia (39.1%). Febrile neutropenia was observed in two patients (8.7%).

conclusionThis phase II study demonstrated promising antitumor activity and good tolerability of UDON.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDocetaxelEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaFemaleFluorouracilHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisOrganoplatinum CompoundsAntineoplastic AgentsDocetaxelFluorouracilnedaplatinOrganoplatinum Compounds

Identifiers

PMID30361422
PMCPMC6369940
OpenAlexW2898321813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.