Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30361381›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2019

Test-Retest Reproducibility of

Brenda F Kurland, Lanell M Peterson, Andrew T Shields, Jean H Lee, Darrin W Byrd, Alena Novakova-Jiresova, Mark Muzi, Jennifer M Specht, David A Mankoff, Hannah M Linden and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. PET/CT reading for relapse in non-small cell lung cancer after chemoradiotherapy in the PET-Plan trial cohort.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2021
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Uncertainties in outcome modelling in radiation oncology.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Repeatability ofEJNMMI research · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A review on advances inInsights into imaging · 2022
    Review
  17. Predictive factors for dental inflammation with exacerbation during cancer therapy with FDG-PET/CT imaging.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Evaluation ofBMC cancer · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Brenda F KurlandDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania bfk10@pitt.edu.
Lanell M PetersonDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington.
Andrew T ShieldsDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and.
Jean H LeeDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and.
Darrin W ByrdDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and.
Alena Novakova-JiresovaDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington.
Mark MuziDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and.
Jennifer M SpechtDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington.
David A MankoffDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Hannah M LindenDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington.
Paul E KinahanDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and.

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA CAN CTR SUPPORT GRANTP30CA016520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SHELLEY L BERGER · 1985 to 2026
$222.3M
Core Laboratory for Advanced PET and MRI image analysisR50CA211270 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Mark Muzi · 2017 to 2026
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016520NCI NIH HHS R50 CA211270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calibration and reproducibility of quantitative

Indexed as

Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAdultAgedBiological TransportCalibrationFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansLiverMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsFluorodeoxyglucose F1818F-FDG PET/CTquantitative imagingreproducibilitySUVtest–retest

Identifiers

PMID30361381
PMCPMC6495239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.