Trial reportEBioMedicine2018
Clinically validated machine learning algorithm for detecting residual diseases with multicolor flow cytometry analysis in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome.
Trial report in EBioMedicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring alternative approaches to precision medicine through genomics and artificial intelligence - a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Measurable Residual Disease.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027Article
- Putting the I in AML: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Cells · 2026Review
- Real-world experience with gilteritinib maintenance following allogeneic transplantation in relapsed/refractory AML patients harboring FLT3 mutations.Blood research · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-based prognostic models in acute myeloid leukemia: systematic review and meta-analysis.Blood neoplasia · 2026Article
- Review
- Artificial intelligence in haematology laboratory diagnosis: Current applications, challenges, and future directions.African journal of laboratory medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Haematologic Diagnostics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives.Acta haematologica · 2026Review
- Review
- A machine learning approach for the rapid identification of measurable residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia.Haematologica · 2025Article
- Review
- Applications of machine learning for immunophenotypic measurable residual disease assessment in acute myeloid leukemia.HemaSphere · 2025Review
- Using Artificial Intelligence to Enhance Myelodysplastic Syndrome Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Machine Learning Methods in Clinical Flow Cytometry.Cancers · 2025Review
- Research advances in the adjunctive diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Computational assessment of measurable residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia using mixture models.Communications medicine · 2024Article
- Review
- Comparison of three machine learning algorithms for classification of B-cell neoplasms using clinical flow cytometry data.Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry · 2024Article
- Measurable (Minimal) Residual Disease in Myelodysplastic Neoplasms (MDS): Current State and Perspectives.Cancers · 2024Review
- Validation of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Assisted Flow Cytometry Analysis for Immunological Disorders.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMulticolor flow cytometry (MFC) analysis is widely used to identify minimal residual disease (MRD) after treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). However, current manual interpretation suffers from drawbacks of time consuming and interpreter idiosyncrasy. Artificial intelligence (AI), with the expertise in assisting repetitive or complex analysis, represents a potential solution for these drawbacks.
methodsFrom 2009 to 2016, 5333 MFC data from 1742 AML or MDS patients were collected. The 287 MFC data at post-induction were selected as the outcome set for clinical outcome validation. The rest were 4:1 randomized into the training set (n = 4039) and the validation set (n = 1007). AI algorithm learned a multi-dimensional MFC phenotype from the training set and input it to support vector machine (SVM) classifier after Gaussian mixture model (GMM) modeling, and the performance was evaluated in The validation set.
findingsPromising accuracies (84·6% to 92·4%) and AUCs (0·921-0·950) were achieved by the developed algorithms. Interestingly, the algorithm from even one testing tube achieved similar performance. The clinical significance was validated in the outcome set, and normal MFC interpreted by the AI predicted better progression-free survival (10·9 vs 4·9 months, p < 0·0001) and overall survival (13·6 vs 6·5 months, p < 0·0001) for AML.
interpretationThrough large-scaled clinical validation, we showed that AI algorithms can produce efficient and clinically-relevant MFC analysis. This approach also possesses a great advantage of the ability to integrate other clinical tests. FUND: This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology (107-2634-F-007-006 and 103-2314-B-002-185-MY2) of Taiwan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.