Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30360961›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation2018

African American Living Donors' Attitudes About APOL1 Genetic Testing: A Mixed Methods Study.

Elisa J Gordon, Daniela Amόrtegui, Isaac Blancas, Catherine Wicklund, John Friedewald, Richard R Sharp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Evaluation and Counseling of Living Kidney Donor Candidates.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2026
    Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Kidney medicine · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Opinions of African American adults about the use of apolipoprotein L1 (ApoL1) genetic testing in living kidney donation and transplantation.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2021
    Article
  17. Apolipoprotein L1: role in the evaluation of kidney transplant donors.Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension · 2020
    Article
  18. Variation ofProgress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.) · 2020
    Article
  19. Kidney international reports · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elisa J GordonDivision of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Center for Healthcare Studies, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL. Electronic address: e-gordon@northwestern.edu.
Daniela AmόrteguiCenter for Healthcare Studies, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Isaac BlancasCenter for Healthcare Studies, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Catherine WicklundCenter for Genetic Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
John FriedewaldDivision of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Division of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Richard R SharpBiomedical Ethics Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Northwestern University · USCal Humanities · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)UL1TR001422 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI D'AQUILA, RICHARD · 2015 to 2023
$56.8M
Ethical and Sociocultural Implications of Genetic Testing in TransplantationR03AI126090 · NIAID · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GORDON, ELISA J · 2016 to 2017
$156k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001422NIAID NIH HHS R03 AI126090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RATIONALE &

objectiveAfrican American live kidney donors ("donors") have a greater risk for kidney failure than European American donors. Apolipoprotein L1 gene (APOL1) variants in African Americans may be associated with this disparity. STUDY

designCross-sectional mixed-methods design. SETTING &

participantsAfrican American donors at 1 transplantation center. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Semistructured interviews assessed attitudes about APOL1 genetic testing, willingness to undergo APOL1 testing, hypothetical decisions about donating with 2 APOL1 variants, and demographics. Surveys assessed perceptions of ethnic identity and genetics knowledge. Interview transcriptions were analyzed using thematic analysis. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

results23 donors participated in semistructured interviews. Most (96%) reported that transplantation centers should routinely offer APOL1 genetic testing to all African American potential donors. Most (87%) would have been willing to undergo APOL1 testing before donating. Although study participants noted that APOL1 testing may deter African American potential donors from donating, most (61%) would have donated even if they had 2 high-risk APOL1 variants. Several themes emerged. Study participants believed that APOL1 testing was beneficial for providing information to help donors make informed donation decisions. Participants expressed concern about APOL1 variants placing donors at harm for kidney failure, and therefore valued taking preventive health measures. Participants believed that potential donors would experience psychological distress from learning that they have 2 gene variants and could harm their recipients. Participants were apprehensive about insurance coverage and costs of APOL1 testing and feared that APOL1 genetic test results could discriminate against African Americans. LIMITATIONS: Findings may not be generalizable to African American potential donors.

conclusionsFindings suggest that African American donors support APOL1 genetic testing yet fear that APOL1 variants and genetic testing could adversely affect donors' health and ethnic identity. Transplantation centers using APOL1 genetic testing should address African American donors' concerns about APOL1 genetic testing to optimize future donors' informed consent practices.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeKidney TransplantationAdultApolipoprotein L1Attitude to HealthBlack or African AmericanCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGenetic TestingHumansInterviews as TopicLiving DonorsMaleMiddle AgedPatient SafetyRisk FactorsApolipoprotein L1African Americanapolipoprotein L1 (APOL1)cultural identityethicsethnicitygenetic testinghealth disparitiesinformed consentkidney transplantationliving donationmedical decision makingqualitative researchsociocultural

Identifiers

PMID30360961
PMCPMC6252162
OpenAlexW2896291150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.