Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30360629›Full record

ArticleBiointerphases2018

Differential orientation and conformation of surface-bound keratinocyte growth factor on (hydroxyethyl)methacrylate, (hydroxyethyl)methacrylate/methyl methacrylate, and (hydroxyethyl)methacrylate/methacrylic acid hydrogel copolymers.

Shohini Sen-Britain, Wesley L Hicks, Robert Hard, Joseph A Gardella

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biointerphases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shohini Sen-BritainDepartment of Chemistry, State University of New York at Buffalo, 475 Natural Sciences Complex, Buffalo, New York 14221.
Wesley L HicksDepartment of Head and Neck/Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Roswell Comprehensive Cancer Center, 665 Elm Street, Buffalo, New York 14203.
Robert HardDepartment of Pathological and Anatomical Sciences, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, 955 Main St, Buffalo, New York 14203.
Joseph A GardellaDepartment of Chemistry, State University of New York at Buffalo, 475 Natural Sciences Complex, Buffalo, New York 14221.
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

Surface Analysis Facility for Biomedical ProblemsP41EB002027 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CASTNER, DAVID G · 2003 to 2019
$17.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB002027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of hydrogels for protein delivery requires protein-hydrogel interactions that cause minimal disruption of the protein's biological activity. Biological activity can be influenced by factors such as orientational accessibility for receptor binding and conformational changes, and these factors can be influenced by the hydrogel surface chemistry. (Hydroxyethyl)methacrylate (HEMA) hydrogels are of interest as drug delivery vehicles for keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) which is known to promote re-epithelialization in wound healing. The authors report here the surface characterization of three different HEMA hydrogel copolymers and their effects on the orientation and conformation of surface-bound KGF. In this work, they characterize two copolymers in addition to HEMA alone and report how protein orientation and conformation is affected. The first copolymer incorporates methyl methacrylate (MMA), which is known to promote the adsorption of protein to its surface due to its hydrophobicity. The second copolymer incorporates methacrylic acid (MAA), which is known to promote the diffusion of protein into its surface due to its hydrophilicity. They find that KGF at the surface of the HEMA/MMA copolymer appears to be more orientationally accessible and conformationally active than KGF at the surface of the HEMA/MAA copolymer. They also report that KGF at the surface of the HEMA/MAA copolymer becomes conformationally unfolded, likely due to hydrogen bonding. KGF at the surface of these copolymers can be differentiated by Fourier-transform infrared-attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry in conjunction with principal component analysis. The differences in KGF orientation and conformation between these copolymers may result in different biological responses in future cell-based experiments.

Indexed as

Drug CarriersHydrogelsMethacrylatesFibroblast Growth Factor 7Immobilized ProteinsProtein ConformationSpectrometry, Mass, Secondary IonSpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredDrug CarriersFibroblast Growth Factor 7HydrogelsImmobilized ProteinsMethacrylates

Identifiers

PMID30360629
PMCPMC6905655
OpenAlexW2898167936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.