ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2018
Two Different Methods of Region-of-Interest Placement for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions by Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Diagnostic performance of breast tumor tissue selection in diffusion weighted imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2020Pooled it
- Can apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) distinguish breast cancer from benign breast findings? A meta-analysis based on 13 847 lesions.BMC cancer · 2019Pooled it
- Comparison of different ROI analysis methods for liver lesion characterization with simplified intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM).Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- Automated Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurement of Breast Tumors in Diffusion-weighted MRI for Early Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response Assessment.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2026Article
- Diffusion-Weighted MRI as a Non-Invasive Diagnostic Tool for Ascites Characterization: A Comparative Analysis of Mean and Minimum ADC Values Against the Serum-Ascites Albumin Gradient.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Deciphering Breast Cancer Complexity: A Study on the Predictive Power of MRI Texture Analysis for Tumor Characterization and Treatment Response.Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology · 2025Article
- DWI in the Differentiation of Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions Presenting with Non-Mass Enhancement on CE-MRI.Cancers · 2024Article
- Simplified intravoxel incoherent motion DWI for differentiating malignant from benign breast lesions.European radiology experimental · 2022Article
- Effect of Inter-Reader Variability on Diffusion-Weighted MRI Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements and Prediction of Pathologic Complete Response for Breast Cancer.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2022Article
- Diffusion Breast MRI: Current Standard and Emerging Techniques.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Discrimination of benign from malignant breast lesions in dense breasts with model-based analysis of regions-of-interest using directional diffusion-weighted images.BMC medical imaging · 2020Article
- Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Noninvasive Parameter for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Intraperitoneal Collections.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: We aimed to investigate the influence of different methods of region-of-interest (ROI) placement on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in breast tumours and their accuracy in differentiating benign versus malignant tumors in mass and nonmass lesions. Methods and Materials: In this prospective study, 79 patients with 98 breast lesions, from 2015 until 2017, were investigated by 1.5-T breast MRI. Histopathology evaluation were done for all malignant lesions and most of the benign ones. ADC values were measured in normal breast tissue and by two ways of ROI placement in the breast lesions (mass and non-mass): 1- ROI covering the whole lesion, 2- ROI in the highest part (most restricted area) of the lesion in DWI images. The accuracy of these two approaches were compared. Results: The age range was 17-68 years with mean age 43.3 ± 9.9 years. 49% of the lesions were benign and 51% of tumors were malignant. Our results revealed that the measured ADC values in normal breast tissue were higher than breast lesions (P≤0.01). Appropriate cut off determination in non-mass was not valid by both methods, but in mass in the first way was 1.45×10 -³mm²/s and in the most restricted part was 1.16×10-³ mm²/s. ADC values differed significantly between the two ways of ROI placement in mass lesions (P<.001). Most restricted part ADC showed the best diagnostic performance in mass lesions with area under curve 0.88 versus 0.82. Conclusion: ROI placement has significant impact on the meseaured ADC values of breast lesions and ROIs in most restricted parts were more accurate than whole-lesion ROIs. Cut-off values differed significantly based on the methods of measurement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.