Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30359976›Full record

ArticleGerontology2019

Instrumented Trail-Making Task: Application of Wearable Sensor to Determine Physical Frailty Phenotypes.

He Zhou, Javad Razjouyan, Debopriyo Halder, Anand D Naik, Mark E Kunik, Bijan Najafi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gerontology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Assessment of gait and balance impairment in people with spinocerebellar ataxia using wearable sensors.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

He ZhouInterdisciplinary Consortium on Advanced Motion Performance (iCAMP), Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Javad RazjouyanInterdisciplinary Consortium on Advanced Motion Performance (iCAMP), Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Debopriyo HalderInterdisciplinary Consortium on Advanced Motion Performance (iCAMP), Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Anand D NaikVA HSR&D, Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Mark E KunikVA HSR&D, Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Bijan NajafiInterdisciplinary Consortium on Advanced Motion Performance (iCAMP), Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USAnajafi.bijan@gmail.com.

Funding

Phase II STTR: Portable Device for Telecare Monitoring of Elderly PeopleR42AG032748 · NIA · BIOSENSICS, LLC · PI GWIN, JOSEPH T, MOHLER, MARTHA JANE · 2012 to 2016
$2.7M
Managing chemotherapy induced neuropathy in Cancer patients using ExerGamingR21CA190933 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI GARLAND, LINDA LEE, NAJAFI, BIJAN · 2016 to 2017
$459k
A novel wearable platform to assess cognitive-motor performanceR41AG058295 · NIA · BIOSENSICS, LLC · PI NAJAFI, BIJAN · 2018 to 2018
$403k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA190933NIA NIH HHS R41 AG058295NIA NIH HHS R42 AG032748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe physical frailty assessment tools that are currently available are often time consuming to use with limited feasibility.

objectiveTo address these limitations, an instrumented trail-making task (iTMT) platform was developed using wearable technology to automate quantification of frailty phenotypes without the need of a frailty walking test.

methodsSixty-one older adults (age = 72.8 ± 9.9 years, body mass index [BMI] = 27.4 ± 4.9 kg/m2) were recruited. According to the Fried Frailty Criteria, 39% of participants were determined as robust and 61% as non-robust (pre-frail or frail). In addition, 17 young subjects (age = 29.0 ± 7.2 years, BMI = 26.2 ± 4.6 kg/m2) were recruited to determine the healthy benchmark. The iTMT included reaching 5 indexed circles (including numbers 1-to-3 and letters A&B placed in random orders), which virtually appeared on a computer-screen, by rotating one's ankle-joint while standing. By using an ankle-worn inertial sensor, 3D ankle-rotation was estimated and mapped into navigation of a computer-cursor in real-time (100 Hz), allowing subjects to navigate the computer-cursor to perform the iTMT. The ankle-sensor was also used for quantifying ankle-rotation velocity (representing slowness), its decline during the test (representing exhaustion), and ankle-velocity variability (representing movement inefficiency), as well as the power (representing weakness) generated during the test. Comparative assessments included Fried frailty phenotypes and gait assessment.

resultsAll subjects were able to complete the iTMT, with an average completion time of 125 ± 85 s. The iTMT-derived parameters were able to identify the presence and absence of slowness, exhaustion, weakness, and inactivity phenotypes (Cohen's d effect size = 0.90-1.40). The iTMT Velocity was significantly different between groups (d = 0.62-1.47). Significant correlation was observed between the iTMT Velocity and gait speed (r = 0.684 p < 0.001). The iTMT-derived parameters and age together enabled significant distinguishing of non-robust cases with area under curve of 0.834, sensitivity of 83%, and specificity of 67%.

conclusionThis study demonstrated a non-gait-based wearable platform to objectively quantify frailty phenotypes and determine physical frailty, using a quick and practical test. This platform may address the hurdles of conventional physical frailty phenotypes methods by replacing the conventional frailty walking test with an automated and objective process that reduces the time of assessment and is more practical for those with mobility limitations.

Indexed as

Physical Functional PerformanceAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFrail ElderlyFrailtyGeriatric AssessmentHumansMaleMotor ActivityMovementPostural BalanceReproducibility of ResultsTask Performance and AnalysisVirtual RealityCognitive-motor testFrailtyFrailty phenotypeGaitInstrumented trail-making taskVirtual-realityWearable

Identifiers

PMID30359976
PMCPMC6426658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.