Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30359482›Full record

ArticleJournal of forensic sciences2019

A Comparison of Thresholding Methods for Forensic Reconstruction Studies Using Fluorescent Powder Proxies for Trace Materials.

Emma A Levin, Ruth M Morgan, Lewis D Griffin, Vivienne J Jones

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of forensic sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emma A LevinCentre for the Forensic Sciences, University College London, 35 Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9EZ, U.K.
Ruth M MorganCentre for the Forensic Sciences, University College London, 35 Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9EZ, U.K.
Lewis D GriffinDeparment of Computer Science, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Vivienne J JonesEnvironmental Change Research Centre, Department of Geography, University College London, Pearson Building, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, U.K.
Pearson (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

HEPATITIS, AFLATOXIN, AND HEPATOCARCINOGENESISR01CA037264 · NCI · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI TENNANT, BUD C · 1985 to 1986
–
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/G037264/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Image segmentation is a fundamental precursor to quantitative image analysis. At present, no standardised methodology exists for segmenting images of fluorescent proxies for trace evidence. Experiments evaluated (i) whether manual segmentation is reproducible within and between examiners (with three participants repeatedly tracing three images) (ii) whether manually defining a threshold level offers accurate and reproducible results (with 20 examiners segmenting 10 images), and (iii) whether a global thresholding algorithm might perform with similar accuracy, while offering improved reproducibility and efficiency (16 algorithms tested). Statistically significant differences were seen between examiners' traced outputs. Manually thresholding produced good accuracy on average (within ±1% of the expected values), but poor reproducibility (with multiple outliers). Three algorithms (Yen, MaxEntropy, and RenyiEntropy) offered similar accuracy, with improved reproducibility and efficiency. Together, these findings suggest that appropriate algorithms could perform thresholding tasks as part of a robust workflow for reconstruction studies employing fluorescent proxies for trace evidence.

Indexed as

fluorescenceforensic scienceimage processingsegmentationthresholdingtrace evidencetransfer and persistenceultraviolet

Identifiers

PMID30359482
PMCPMC6849572
OpenAlexW2898233115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.