Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30359464›Full record

ArticleCancer2018

A conceptual framework and metrics for evaluating multicomponent interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening within an organized screening program.

Sujha Subramanian, Sonja Hoover, Florence K L Tangka, Amy DeGroff, Cynthia S Soloe, Laura C Arena, Dara F Schlueter, Djenaba A Joseph, Faye L Wong

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sujha SubramanianRTI International, Waltham, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-2415-9721
Sonja HooverRTI International, Waltham, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-6205-1212
Florence K L TangkaDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Amy DeGroffDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Cynthia S SoloeRTI International, Waltham, Massachusetts.
Laura C ArenaRTI International, Waltham, Massachusetts.
Dara F SchlueterDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Djenaba A JosephDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Faye L WongDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USRTI International · US

Funding

CDC HHSIntramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMulticomponent, evidence-based interventions are viewed increasingly as essential for increasing the use of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening to meet national targets. Multicomponent interventions involve complex care pathways and interactions across multiple levels, including the individual, health system, and community.

methodsThe authors developed a framework and identified metrics and data elements to evaluate the implementation processes, effectiveness, and cost effectiveness of multicomponent interventions used in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Colorectal Cancer Control Program.

resultsProcess measures to evaluate the implementation of interventions to increase community and patient demand for CRC screening, increase patient access, and increase provider delivery of services are presented. In addition, performance measures are identified to assess implementation processes along the continuum of care for screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Series of intermediate and long-term outcome and cost measures also are presented to evaluate the impact of the interventions.

conclusionsUnderstanding the effectiveness of multicomponent, evidence-based interventions and identifying successful approaches that can be replicated in other settings are essential to increase screening and reduce CRC burden. The use of common framework, data elements, and evaluation methods will allow the performance of comparative assessments of the interventions implemented across CRCCP sites to identify best practices for increasing colorectal screening, particularly among underserved populations, to reduce disparities in CRC incidence and mortality.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerEvidence-Based PracticeMass ScreeningAgedColorectal NeoplasmsCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHealth Plan ImplementationHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, EconometricNational Health ProgramsProgram Evaluationcancer screeningCenters for Disease Control and Preventioncolorectal cancercost effectivenessqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID30359464
PMCPMC6289181
OpenAlexW2898462452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.