ArticlePloS one2018
Affinity, potency, efficacy, and selectivity of neurokinin A analogs at human recombinant NK2 and NK1 receptors.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- The neuropeptide substance P regulates aldosterone secretion in human adrenals.Nature communications · 2020Trial
- The C-terminal truncated splicing variant of NK1R negatively modulates substance P-stimulated NK1R signaling.FEBS open bio · 2026Article
- Recent Developments in On-Demand Voiding Therapies.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2024Review
- Neurokinin-2 receptor negatively modulates substance P responses by forming complex with Neurokinin-1 receptor.Cell & bioscience · 2023Article
- [LysJournal of basic and clinical physiology and pharmacology · 2023Article
- Dopamine and Dopamine-Related Ligands Can Bind Not Only to Dopamine Receptors.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Potency, efficacy, and selectivity of GR64349 at human recombinant neurokinin NK2 and NK1 receptors.Neuroscience letters · 2019Article
- Prokinetic effects of the neurokinin NK2 receptor agonist [LysNeuropeptides · 2019Article
- Neuropeptide-induced modulation of carcinogenesis in a metastatic breast cancer cell line (MDA-MB-231Cancer cell international · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A series of peptide NK2 receptor agonists was evaluated for affinity, potency, efficacy, and selectivity at human recombinant NK2 and NK1 receptors expressed in CHO cells to identify compounds with the greatest separation between NK2 and NK1 receptor agonist activity. Binding studies were performed using displacement of [125I]-NKA binding to NK2 receptors and displacement of [3H]-Septide binding to NK1 receptors expressed in CHO cells. Functional studies examining the increase in intracellular calcium levels and cyclic AMP stimulation were performed using the same cell lines. A correlation was demonstrated between binding affinities (Ki) and potency to increase intracellular calcium (EC50) for NK2 and NK1 receptors. Ranking compounds by their relative affinity (Ki) or potency (EC50) at NK2 or NK1 receptors indicated that the most selective NK2 agonists tested were [Lys5,MeLeu9,Nle10]-NKA(4-10) (NK1/NK2 Ki ratio = 674; NK1/NK2 EC50 ratio = 105) and [Arg5,MeLeu9,Nle10]-NKA(4-10) (NK1/NK2 Ki ratio = 561; NK1/NK2 EC50 ratio = 70). The endogenous peptide, NKA, lacked selectivity with an NK1/NK2 Ki ratio = 20 and NK1/NK2 EC50 ratio = 1. Of the compounds selected for evaluation in cyclic AMP stimulation assays, [β-Ala8]-NKA(4-10) had the greatest selectivity for activation of NK2 over NK1 receptors (NK1/NK2 EC50 ratio = 244), followed by [Lys5,MeLeu9,Nle10]-NKA(4-10) (ratio = 74), and NKA exhibited marginal selectivity (ratio = 2.8).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.