Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30359393›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

DeepFocus: Detection of out-of-focus regions in whole slide digital images using deep learning.

Caglar Senaras, M Khalid Khan Niazi, Gerard Lozanski, Metin N Gurcan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Caglar SenarasCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4211-4367
M Khalid Khan NiaziCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States of America.
Gerard LozanskiDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
Metin N GurcanCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States of America.

Funding

Pathology Image Informatics Platform for visualization, analysis and managementU24CA199374 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GURCAN, METIN NAFI, MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
Computer-based assessment of tumor microenvironment (TME) in Follicular LymphomaR01CA134451 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GURCAN, METIN NAFI, LOZANSKI, GERARD · 2009 to 2017
$2.3M
Task-Specific Compression for Biomedical Big DataU01CA198945 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI BILGIN, ALI · 2015 to 2017
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA134451NCI NIH HHS U01 CA198945NCI NIH HHS U24 CA199374
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of whole slide scanners has revolutionized the field of digital pathology. Unfortunately, whole slide scanners often produce images with out-of-focus/blurry areas that limit the amount of tissue available for a pathologist to make accurate diagnosis/prognosis. Moreover, these artifacts hamper the performance of computerized image analysis systems. These areas are typically identified by visual inspection, which leads to a subjective evaluation causing high intra- and inter-observer variability. Moreover, this process is both tedious, and time-consuming. The aim of this study is to develop a deep learning based software called, DeepFocus, which can automatically detect and segment blurry areas in digital whole slide images to address these problems. DeepFocus is built on TensorFlow, an open source library that exploits data flow graphs for efficient numerical computation. DeepFocus was trained by using 16 different H&E and IHC-stained slides that were systematically scanned on nine different focal planes, generating 216,000 samples with varying amounts of blurriness. When trained and tested on two independent datasets, DeepFocus resulted in an average accuracy of 93.2% (± 9.6%), which is a 23.8% improvement over an existing method. DeepFocus has the potential to be integrated with whole slide scanners to automatically re-scan problematic areas, hence improving the overall image quality for pathologists and image analysis algorithms.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsArea Under CurveImage Processing, Computer-AssistedROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID30359393
PMCPMC6201886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.