ArticleStem cell research & therapy2018
Efficacy of intraoperatively prepared cell-based constructs for bone regeneration.
Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transformation of the Biological Paradigm in Bone Regeneration: An Integrative Review.Journal of developmental biology · 2026Review
- Extracellular vesicle-functionalized bioactive scaffolds for bone regeneration.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2024Review
- The Use of Stromal Vascular Fraction in Long Bone Defect Healing in Sheep.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Clinical applications of adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction in veterinary practice.The veterinary quarterly · 2022Article
- Autologous and Allogenic Utilization of Stromal Vascular Fraction and Decellularized Extracellular Matrices in Orthopedic Surgery: A Scoping Review.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2022Article
- Cryopreserved human adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction maintains fracture healing potential via angiogenesis and osteogenesis in an immunodeficient rat model.Stem cell research & therapy · 2021Article
- Stromal Vascular Fraction and Amniotic Epithelial Cells: Preclinical and Clinical Relevance in Musculoskeletal Regenerative Medicine.Stem cells international · 2021Review
- Bone tumor-targeted delivery of theranosticMaterials today. Bio · 2021Article
- Article
- Secreted Factors and EV-miRNAs Orchestrate the Healing Capacity of Adipose Mesenchymal Stem Cells for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConventional cell-based bone regeneration suffers from the major disadvantage of limited cell supply, time-consuming in vitro expansion cultures, and limited patient-friendliness related to cell isolation and multiple visits to the clinic. Here, we utilized an alternative concept using "easy access cells" that can be obtained in an intraoperative manner to prepare cell-based constructs.
methodsWe used stromal vascular fraction (SVF) from human adipose tissue and human monocytes for intraoperative preparation of bone constructs. Conventional constructs grafted with expanded human adipose tissue mesenchymal stem cells (ADMSCs) derived from the same donor were set as positive controls. Additionally, we combined both cell types either or not with monocytes. The cellular interaction of human SVF and ADMSCs with human monocytes was evaluated in vitro. The feasibility and bone-regenerative capacity of intraoperative constructs were determined histologically and histomorphometrically in a rat femoral condyle bone defect model.
resultsSVF displayed equal in vitro osteogenic differentiation compared to donor-matched expanded ADMSCs, which for both was significantly enhanced upon co-culture with monocytes. Moreover, SVF and ADMSCs displayed different immunoregulatory effects on monocytes/macrophages. Upon implantation in rat femoral bone defects, SVF constructs demonstrated superior bone formation compared to ADMSC constructs and cell-free controls; no effects of monocyte addition were observed.
conclusionIn conclusion, we here demonstrate the feasibility of intraoperative SVF construct preparation and superior bone-regenerative capacity thereof compared to donor-matched ADMSC constructs. The superiority of SVF constructs was found to be linked to the distinct differences between immunoregulatory effects of SVF and ADMSCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.