Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30359252›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2018

Influence of midgut microbiota in Anopheles stephensi on Plasmodium berghei infections.

Devaiah Monnanda Kalappa, Pradeep Annamalai Subramani, Sowmya Kanchanahalli Basavanna, Susanta Kumar Ghosh, Varadharajan Sundaramurthy, Sreehari Uragayala, Satyanarayan Tiwari, Anupkumar R Anvikar, Neena Valecha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The mosquito gut microbiome andFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Role of microbiota in host-Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Mosquito Gut Microbiota: A Review.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Reconstruction of Gut Bacteria inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  17. Malaria Genomics, Vaccine Development, and Microbiome.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Bio-products fromFrontiers in tropical diseases · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Devaiah Monnanda KalappaICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research (Field Unit), Nirmal Bhawan-ICMR Campus, Poojanahalli, Kannamangala Post, Devanahalli Taluk, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 562110, India.
Pradeep Annamalai SubramaniICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research (Field Unit), Nirmal Bhawan-ICMR Campus, Poojanahalli, Kannamangala Post, Devanahalli Taluk, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 562110, India.
Sowmya Kanchanahalli BasavannaICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research (Field Unit), Nirmal Bhawan-ICMR Campus, Poojanahalli, Kannamangala Post, Devanahalli Taluk, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 562110, India.
Susanta Kumar GhoshICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research (Field Unit), Nirmal Bhawan-ICMR Campus, Poojanahalli, Kannamangala Post, Devanahalli Taluk, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 562110, India. ghoshnimr@gmail.com.
Varadharajan SundaramurthyNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, GKVK Campus, Bellary Road, Bengaluru, 560065, India.
Sreehari UragayalaICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research (Field Unit), Nirmal Bhawan-ICMR Campus, Poojanahalli, Kannamangala Post, Devanahalli Taluk, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 562110, India.
Satyanarayan TiwariICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research (Field Unit), Nirmal Bhawan-ICMR Campus, Poojanahalli, Kannamangala Post, Devanahalli Taluk, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 562110, India.
Anupkumar R AnvikarICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, Sector 8, Dwarka, New Delhi, 110077, India.
Neena ValechaICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, Sector 8, Dwarka, New Delhi, 110077, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe native gut microbiota of Anopheles mosquitoes is known to play a key role in the physiological function of its host. Interestingly, this microbiota can also influence the development of Plasmodium in its host mosquitoes. In recent years, much interest has been shown in the employment of gut symbionts derived from vectors in the control of vector-borne disease transmission. In this study, the midgut microbial diversity has been characterized among laboratory-reared adult Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes, from the colony created by rearing progeny of wild-caught mosquitoes (obtained from three different locations in southern India) for multiple generations, using 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing approach. Further, the influence of native midgut microbiota of mosquitoes on the development of rodent malaria parasite Plasmodium berghei in its host has been studied.

methodsThe microbial diversity associated with the midgut of An. stephensi mosquitoes was studied by sequencing V3 region of 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene. The influence of native midgut microbiota of An. stephensi mosquitoes on the susceptibility of the mosquitoes to rodent malaria parasite P. berghei was studied by comparing the intensity and prevalence of P. berghei infection among the antibiotic treated and untreated cohorts of mosquitoes.

resultsThe analysis of bacterial diversity from the midguts of An. stephensi showed Proteobacteria as the most dominant population among the three laboratory-reared strains of An. stephensi studied. Major genera identified among these mosquito strains were Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, Prevotella, Corynebacterium, Veillonella, and Bacillus. The mosquito infectivity studies carried out to determine the implication of total midgut microbiota on P. berghei infection showed that mosquitoes whose native microbiota cleared with antibiotics had increased susceptibility to P. berghei infection compared to the antibiotic untreated mosquitoes with its natural native microbiota.

conclusionsThe use of microbial symbiont to reduce the competence of vectors involved in disease transmission has gained much importance in recent years as an emerging alternative approach towards disease control. In this context, the present study was aimed to identify the midgut microbiota composition of An. stephensi, and its effect on the development of P. berghei. Interestingly, the analysis of midgut microbiota from An. stephensi revealed the presence of genus Veillonella in Anopheles species for the first time. Importantly, the study also revealed the negative influence of total midgut microbiota on the development of P. berghei in three laboratory strains of An. stephensi, emphasizing the importance of understanding the gut microbiota in malaria vectors, and its relationship with parasite development in designing strategies to control malaria transmission.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsAnimals, LaboratoryAnophelesBacteriaEndemic DiseasesGeographyIndiaPlasmodium bergheiRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, RNARNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAnophelesMalariaMicrobiotaMosquitoesPlasmodium bergheiVeillonella

Identifiers

PMID30359252
PMCPMC6203276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.