Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30359251›Full record

Observational studyBMC health services research2018

Relational autonomy in breast diseases care: a qualitative study of contextual and social conditions of patients' capacity for decision-making.

Patti Shih, Frances Rapport, Anne Hogden, Mia Bierbaum, Jeremy Hsu, John Boyages, Jeffrey Braithwaite

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Patient experiences of decision-making in the treatment of spinal metastases: a qualitative study.The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patti ShihCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia. patti.shih@mq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9628-7987
Frances RapportCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Anne HogdenCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Mia BierbaumCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jeremy HsuDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
John BoyagesDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jeffrey BraithwaiteCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Macquarie University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA relational approach to autonomy refers to the way in which social conditions and relationships shape a person's self-identity and capacity in decision-making. This article provides an empirical account of how treatment choices for women undergoing breast diseases care are fostered within the dynamics of their relationships with clinicians, family members, and other aspects of their social environment.

methodsThis qualitative study recruited ten women undergoing treatment at a breast programme, and eight clinicians supporting their care, in a private teaching hospital in New South Wales, Australia. Fourteen patient-clinician consultation observations and 17 semi-structured interviews were conducted. Schema analysis of interview transcripts were undertaken by a team of researchers and corroborated by observational fieldnotes.

resultsRelational identities of patients influenced the rationale for treatment decision-making. Patients drew on supportive resources from family and medical advice from clinicians to progress with treatment goals. While clinicians held much social power over patients as the medical experts, patients highlighted the need for clinicians to earn their trust through demonstrated professionalism. Information exchange created a communicative space for clinicians and patients to negotiate shared values, promoting greater patient ownership of treatment decisions. As treatment progressed, patients' personal experiences of illness and treatment became a source of self-reflection, with a transformative impact on self-confidence and assertiveness.

conclusionPatients' confidence and self-trust can be fostered by opportunities for communicative engagement and self-reflection over the course of treatment in breast disease, and better integration of their self-identity and social values in treatment decisions.

Indexed as

Decision MakingPersonal AutonomyAdultAgedBreast DiseasesCommunicationFamilyFamily RelationsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNew South WalesPhysician-Patient RelationsPower, PsychologicalQualitative ResearchSocial ConditionsBreast cancer careBreast disease carePatient autonomyPerson-centred careRelational autonomyTreatment decision-making

Identifiers

PMID30359251
PMCPMC6202865
OpenAlexW2898141780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.