Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30359092›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2019

Percutaneous ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted excision of benign breast lesions: A learning curve to assess outcomes.

Juan Pablo Salazar, Ignacio Miranda, Juan de Torres, María N Rus, Martin Espinosa-Bravo, Antonio Esgueva, Rafael Salvador, Isabel T Rubio

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Efficacy and safety of microwave ablation for benign breast lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Juan Pablo Salazar1 Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging.Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron , Barcelona , Spain.
Ignacio Miranda1 Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging.Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron , Barcelona , Spain.
Juan de Torres1 Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging.Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron , Barcelona , Spain.
María N Rus1 Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging.Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron , Barcelona , Spain.
Martin Espinosa-Bravo3 Breast Surgical Oncology. Department of Gynecology. Hospital UniversitarioVall d'Hebron , Barcelona , Spain.
Antonio Esgueva4 Breast Surgical Oncology Unit. Clinica Universidad de Navarra , Madrid , Spain.
Rafael Salvador5 Imagine Diagnostic Imaging , Barcelona , Spain.
Isabel T Rubio4 Breast Surgical Oncology Unit. Clinica Universidad de Navarra , Madrid , Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objective: To evaluate the efficacy and learning curve of ultrasoundguided vacuum-assisted excision (US-VAE) of benign breast lesions, and to assess characteristics associated with residual lesion.

methods: This was a retrospective study with institutional review board-approval. Sonographic and clinical follow-up were performed 6 months after intervention. Effectiveness and safety of the technique were analyzed. The cumulative summation (CUSUM) graphs were used to evaluate learning curves concerning complete excision and hematoma.

results: 152 ultrasound-VAEs in 143 patients were included. Initial complete resection was achieved in 90.8 % (138 of 152). 6-month follow-up was completed for 143 (94%) of cases and complete resection was observed in 72 % (100 of 143). Mean maximum size without residual tumor was 16.9 mm, while with residual lesion it was 21.9 mm (p = < 0.001), with a volume of 1.53 and 3.39 cm

conclusion: Ultrasound-VAE is an effective treatment for benign breast lesions. Breast lesion volume should be considered when assessing for percutaneous treatment. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:: A follow-up of the learning process of ultrasound-VAE will be a valuable tool to assess the efectiveness and safety of the technique i.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBiopsy, NeedleBreastBreast DiseasesChi-Square DistributionFemaleHumansLearning CurveMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUltrasonography, InterventionalUltrasonography, MammaryVacuumYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30359092
PMCPMC6404808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.