ArticleThe British journal of radiology2019
Excessive applicator radiation leakage for a common therapeutic kilovoltage system.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objective: The objective of this work is to characterise out- of- field leakage radiation emanating from clinical applicators of the WOmed T-200 kilovoltage therapy machine.
methods: To identify points of leakage, radiosensitive film was affixed to the walls and base plate of each applicator. Quantitative assessment of leakage radiation was conducted with a 0.23 cm
results: Leakage was found when the diameter of primary collimator of the kV tube exceeded the external dimension of the applicator wall. In the patient plane all applicators showed similar leakage rates with the leakage distribution dependent upon applicator design. Mean patient plane leakage was 1.37% of central axis air kerma rate, exceeding the 0.5% limit specified in the standard. Leakage was shown to be profoundly energy dependent with maximum leakage of 11.8% for the 200 kV beam, 1.3% for 150 kV and 0.2% for 100 kV. Angular dependence measurements showed a 10.3% change in leakage between the minimum and maximum positions.
conclusionThe combination of shielding thickness, primary collimator design and applicator dimensions permits unwanted radiation to contribute dose outside the treatment field when energies ≥150 kV are used. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:: Even carefully designed modern kv therapy systems can exhibit leakage in some areas. Thorough assessment of leakage is needed prior to release for clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.