ArticleDevelopmental psychology2019
Language status at age 3: Group and individual prediction from vocabulary comprehension in the second year.
Article in Developmental psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early child measures outpredict input measures of preschool language skills in U.S. English learners.Developmental psychology · 2026Article
- Using Parent Report to Measure Vocabulary in Young Bilingual Children: A Scoping Review.Language learning · 2024Article
- Touching while listening: Does infants' haptic word processing speed predict vocabulary development?Journal of child language · 2024Article
- Drivers of Lexical Processing and Implications for Early Learning.Annual review of developmental psychology · 2022Article
- Lexico-semantic structure in vocabulary and its links to lexical processing in toddlerhood and language outcomes at age three.Developmental psychology · 2022Article
- Visual and haptic responses as measures of word comprehension and speed of processing in toddlers: Relative predictive utility.Journal of experimental child psychology · 2021Article
- The Relationship Between Lexical and Phonological Development in French-Speaking Children: A Longitudinal Study.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020Article
- Do early lexical skills predict language outcome at 3 years? A longitudinal study of French-speaking children.Infant behavior & development · 2019Article
- Convergence and divergence in prediction from vocabulary and speed of word processing.Cognitive developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The present research extends recent work on the prediction of preschool language skills by exploring prediction from decontextualized vocabulary comprehension. Vocabulary comprehension was a stronger predictor than parent-reported production, yielding a quadrupling of variance accounted for relative to prior studies. Parallel studies (Studies 1 and 2) are reported for two linguistically and geographically distinct samples. In both samples, decontextualized vocabulary comprehension late in the second year provided the best balance between model fit and parsimony in predicting language skills at age three. In Study 3, vocabulary comprehension prospectively identified children with low language status 2 years earlier than other prospective studies but with similar sensitivity and specificity. The present paper provides evidence on three questions of practical and theoretical significance: the relation between decontextualized vocabulary prior to 30 months of age and language outcomes, how prediction from decontextualized vocabulary compares with parent-reported vocabulary, and finally how early stable predictions to language outcomes can be made. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.