Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30358863›Full record

ArticleJournal of pediatric psychology2019

Content and Usability Evaluation of Medication Adherence Mobile Applications for Use in Pediatrics.

Julia K Carmody, Lee A Denson, Kevin A Hommel

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pediatric psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion within Pediatric Adherence Science.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Mobile Application on Adherence of Patients With Arterial Hypertension.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julia K CarmodyCenter for Adherence and Self-Management.
Lee A DensonDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.
Kevin A HommelCenter for Adherence and Self-Management.

Funding

Enhancing treatment adherence and health outcomesT32HD068223 · NICHD · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI Kevin Hommel, Meghan Eileen McGrady · 2012 to 2026
$3.6M
Patient Preferences and Adherence in Adolescents and Young Adults with CancerK07CA200668 · NCI · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI MCGRADY, MEGHAN EILEEN · 2016 to 2020
$724k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA200668NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD068223
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to systematically evaluate commercially available medication adherence apps for the inclusion of behavior change techniques (BCTs) and to conduct a usability analysis on a subset of apps with adolescents and young adults living with a chronic illness.

methodsMedication adherence apps were identified via a search of iTunes app store in August 2016. Seventy-five apps meeting initial inclusion criteria were independently coded by two researchers for the presence/absence of 26 BCTs. Twenty adolescents and young adults (ages: 13-20 years) with inflammatory bowel disease conducted usability testing on a subset of apps (n = 4).

resultsAcross 75 apps coded for presence/absence of 26 BCTs, only 7 unique BCTs were identified. The number of BCTs per app ranged from 2 to 6, with an average of 3.3 BCTs. In usability testing, quality ratings varied across apps. Medisafe received the highest average scores on engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information subscales. Medisafe and MyTherapy ranked first and second, respectively, on overall quality and perceived impact ratings.

conclusionContent evaluation revealed only a limited number of BCTs that have been translated to medication adherence apps. Among apps with comparable content, clear user preferences emerged based on perceived quality and usability. Greater collaboration is needed between psychologists and health technologists to incorporate more evidence-based BCTs in apps. Findings also indicate a need for app developers to consider and incorporate the preferences of younger end users to improve app quality and engagement for pediatric populations.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorMedication AdherencePatient PreferenceAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansInflammatory Bowel DiseasesMaleMobile ApplicationsPediatricsYoung Adultadherencebehavior change techniquem-healthmobile appusability

Identifiers

PMID30358863
PMCPMC6415658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.