Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30358853›Full record

ArticleHealth education research2019

Using graphic warning labels to counter effects of social cues and brand imagery in cigarette advertising.

J Niederdeppe, D Kemp, E Jesch, L Scolere, A Greiner Safi, N Porticella, R J Avery, M C Dorf, A D Mathios, S Byrne

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health education research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J NiederdeppeDepartment of Communication, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
D KempDepartment of Communication, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
E JeschDepartment of Communication, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
L ScolereDepartment of Design and Merchandising, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
A Greiner SafiDepartment of Communication, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
N PorticellaDepartment of Communication, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
R J AveryDepartment of Policy Analysis and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
M C DorfCornell Law School, Ithaca, NY, USA.
A D MathiosDepartment of Policy Analysis and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
S ByrneDepartment of Communication, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Cornell University · USPolicy Analysis (United States) · USColorado State University · US

Funding

Impact of Flavors in Tobacco Products: An Experimental Market AnalysisR01HD079612 · NICHD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI BYRNE, SAHARA ELIZABETH, NIEDERDEPPE, JEFFREY D · 2014 to 2018
$3.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD079612
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to cigarette advertising can increase the likelihood of youth smoking initiation and may encourage people who already smoke to continue. Requiring prominent, graphic warning labels could reduce these effects. We test whether graphic versus text-only warning labels in cigarette advertisements influence cognitive and emotional factors associated with youth susceptibility to smoking and adult intentions to quit. We conducted two randomized, between-subjects experiments with middle-school youth (n = 474) and adult smokers (n = 451). Both studies employed a two (graphic or text-only warnings) by two (advertisements with social cues or brand imagery) factorial design with a fifth, offset control group (social cue advertisements with the current US Surgeon General's Warning). Graphic warnings outperformed text-only warnings in reducing visual attention to the advertisement, generating visual attention to the warning and arousing more negative affect. Graphic warnings also reduced the appeal of cigarette brands among youth relative to social cue advertisements with the Surgeon General's warnings. None of the warnings (graphic or textual) influenced health risk beliefs. Graphic warning labels on cigarette advertisements appear to have effects similar to those observed on cigarette packs in previous work, with an added benefit of reducing cigarette brand appeal among youth.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAdvertisingFemaleHumansIntentionMalePovertyProduct LabelingSmokersSmokingSmoking CessationTobacco Products

Identifiers

PMID30358853
PMCPMC6315110
OpenAlexW2898335331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.