Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30358843›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2018

Donor spermatogenesis in de novo formed seminiferous tubules from transplanted testicular cells in rhesus monkey testis.

Gunapala Shetty, Jennifer M Mitchell, Truong Nguyen Anh Lam, Zhuang Wu, Jie Zhang, Lorraine Hill, Ramesh C Tailor, Karen A Peters, Maria Cecilia Penedo, Kyle E Orwig and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Modeling Human Gonad Development in Organoids.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Approaches and Technologies in Male Fertility Preservation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Gunapala ShettyDepartment of Experimental Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Jennifer M MitchellDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Truong Nguyen Anh LamDepartment of Experimental Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Zhuang WuDepartment of Experimental Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Jie ZhangDepartment of Experimental Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Lorraine HillDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Ramesh C TailorDepartment of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Karen A PetersDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Maria Cecilia PenedoVeterinary Genetics Laboratory, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Kyle E OrwigDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Marvin L MeistrichDepartment of Experimental Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USMagee-Womens Research Institute · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Transplant CoreP01HD075795 · NICHD · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI CLARK, AMANDER · 2014 to 2018
$7.0M
Cellular Mechanisms of Chemotherapy-induced Male Infertility: Stem Cell or Niche?R01HD076412 · NICHD · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI ORWIG, KYLE EDWIN · 2014 to 2018
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD075795NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD076412
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionCan transplanted primate testicular cells form seminiferous tubules de novo, supporting complete spermatogenesis? SUMMARY ANSWER: Cryopreserved testicular cells from a prepubertal monkey can reorganize in an adult monkey recipient testis forming de novo seminiferous tubular cords supporting complete spermatogenesis. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: De novo morphogenesis of testicular tissue using aggregated cells from non-primate species grafted either subcutaneously or in the testis can support spermatogenesis. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Two postpubertal rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) were given testicular irradiation. One monkey was given GnRH-antagonist treatment from 8 to 16 weeks after irradiation, while the other received sham injections. At 16 weeks, cryopreserved testicular cells from two different prepubertal monkeys [43 × 106 viable (Trypan-blue excluding) cells in 260 μl, and 80 × 106 viable cells in 400 μl] were transplanted via ultrasound-guided injections to one of the rete testis in each recipient, and immune suppression was given. The contralateral testis was sham transplanted. Testes were analyzed 9 months after transplantation. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsSpermatogenic recovery was assessed by testicular volume, weight, histology and immunofluorescence. Microsatellite genotyping of regions of testicular sections obtained by LCM determined whether the cells were derived from the host or transplanted cells. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Transplanted testis of the GnRH-antagonist-treated recipient, but not the sham-treated recipient, contained numerous irregularly shaped seminiferous tubular cords, 89% of which had differentiating germ cells, including sperm in a few of them. The percentages of donor genotype in different regions of this testis were as follows: normal tubule, 0%; inflammatory, 0%; abnormal tubule region, 67%; whole interior of abnormal tubules, >99%; adluminal region of the abnormal tubules, 92%. Thus, these abnormal tubules, including the enclosed germ cells, were derived de novo from the donor testicular cells. LARGE SCALE DATA: Not applicable. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The de novo tubules were observed in only one out of the two monkeys transplanted with prepubertal donor testicular cells. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsThese findings may represent a promising strategy for restoration of fertility in male childhood cancer survivors. The approach could be particularly useful in those exposed to therapeutic agents that are detrimental to the normal development of the tubule somatic cells affecting the ability of the endogenous tubules to support spermatogenesis, even from transplanted spermatogonial stem cells. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by research grants P01 HD075795 from Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development (NICHD/NIH) to K.E.O and Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA016672 from NCI/NIH to The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Indexed as

AnimalsGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneHormone AntagonistsMacaca mulattaMaleSeminiferous TubulesSpermatogenesisTestisGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneHormone Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID30358843
PMCPMC6454559
OpenAlexW2898257463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.