Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30358821›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2018

Cognitive control involves theta power within trials and beta power across trials in the prefrontal-subthalamic network.

Baltazar Zavala, Anthony Jang, Michael Trotta, Codrin I Lungu, Peter Brown, Kareem A Zaghloul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Frontal theta power prospectively associated with response inhibition.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Baltazar ZavalaSurgical Neurology Branch, NINDS, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Anthony JangSurgical Neurology Branch, NINDS, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Michael TrottaSurgical Neurology Branch, NINDS, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Codrin I LunguDivision of Clinical Research, NINDS, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA.
Peter BrownMedical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit at the University of Oxford and Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurology, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Kareem A ZaghloulSurgical Neurology Branch, NINDS, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Funding

Investigating the neural mechanisms of human cognitive function through intracranial recordingsZIANS003144 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI ZAGHLOUL, KAREEM · 2014 to 2025
$36.1M
Medical Research Council MC_UU_12024/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that the medial prefrontal cortex participates in conflict and feedback monitoring while the subthalamic nucleus adjusts actions. Yet how these two structures coordinate their activity during cognitive control remains poorly understood. We recorded from the human prefrontal cortex and the subthalamic nucleus simultaneously while participants (n = 22) performed a novel task involving high conflict trials, complete response inhibition trials, and trial-to-trial behavioural adaptations to conflict and errors. Overall, we found that within-trial adaptions to both conflict and complete response inhibition involved changes in the theta band while across-trial behavioural adaptations to both conflict and errors involved changes in the beta band (P < 0.05). Yet the role each region's theta and beta oscillations played during the task differed significantly between the two sites. Trials that involved either within-trial conflict or complete response inhibition were associated with increased theta phase synchrony between the medial prefrontal cortex and the subthalamic nucleus (P < 0.05). Despite increased synchrony, however, increases in prefrontal theta power were associated with response inhibition, while increases in subthalamic theta power were associated with response execution (P < 0.05). In the beta band, post-response increases in prefrontal beta power were suppressed when the completed trial contained either conflict or an erroneous response (P < 0.05). Subthalamic beta power, on the other hand, was only modified during the subsequent trial that followed a conflict or error trial. Notably, these adaptation trials exhibited slower response times (P < 0.05), suggesting that both brain regions contribute to across-trial adaptations but do so at different stages of the adaptation process. Taken together, our data shed light on the mechanisms underlying within-trial and across-trial cognitive control and how disruption of this network can negatively impact cognition. More broadly, however, our data also demonstrate that the specific role of a brain region, rather than the frequency being utilized, governs the behavioural correlates of oscillatory activity.

Indexed as

Beta RhythmTheta RhythmConflict, PsychologicalElectroencephalographyExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansInhibition, PsychologicalMaleMiddle AgedNeural PathwaysNeuronsPrefrontal CortexSubthalamic Nucleus

Identifiers

PMID30358821
PMCPMC6272116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.