Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30358703›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society2018

Sexual Health as Part of Gynecologic Cancer Care: What Do Patients Want?

Casey M Hay, Heidi S Donovan, Erin G Hartnett, Jeanne Carter, Mary C Roberge, Grace B Campbell, Benjamin E Zuchelkowski, Sarah E Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Clinical Practice Strategies to Address Sexual Health in Female Cancer Survivors.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Sexuality of Women after Gynecological Surgeries.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Casey M HayDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Magee-Womens Hospital of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.
Heidi S DonovanSchool of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Erin G HartnettDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Magee-Womens Hospital of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.
Jeanne CarterGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Mary C RobergeSchool of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Grace B CampbellSchool of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Benjamin E ZuchelkowskiUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
Sarah E TaylorDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Magee-Womens Hospital of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSexual health is important to quality of life; however, the sexual health of gynecologic cancer patients is infrequently and inadequately addressed. We sought to understand patient experiences and preferences for sexual health care to help inform strategies for improvement. METHODS/MATERIALS: An anonymous, cross-sectional survey of outpatient gynecologic cancer patients at a large academic medical center was performed as part of a larger study examining patient and caregiver needs. The survey explored patient-provider discussions about sexuality across 3 domains (experiences, preferences, barriers) and 4 phases of cancer care (diagnosis, treatment, treatment completion, follow-up). Age, relationship status, sexual activity, and cancer type were recorded.

resultsMean age was 63 years. Most patients had ovarian cancer (38%) or endometrial cancer (32%). Thirty-seven percent received treatment within the last month, 55% were in a relationship, and 35% were sexuality active. Thirty-four percent reported sexuality as somewhat or very important, whereas 27% felt that it was somewhat or very important to discuss. Importance of sexuality was associated with age, relationship status, and sexual activity but not cancer type. Fifty-seven percent reported never discussing sexuality. Age was associated with sexuality discussions, whereas relationship status, sexual activity, and cancer type were not. The most common barrier to discussion was patient discomfort. Follow-up was identified as the best time for discussion. Sexuality was most often discussed with a physician or advanced practice provider and usually brought up by the provider.

conclusionsDemographic predictors of importance of sexuality to the patient are age, relationship status, and sexual activity. Providers primarily use age as a proxy for importance of sexuality; however, relationship status and sexual activity may represent additional ways to screen for patients interested in discussing sexual health. Patient discomfort with discussing sexuality is the primary barrier to sexual health discussions, and awareness of this is key to developing effective approaches to providing sexual health care.

Indexed as

Sexual HealthSexualityAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleGenital Neoplasms, FemaleHumansMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsPalliative CarePatient PreferenceQuality of LifeSexual Dysfunctions, Psychological

Identifiers

PMID30358703
PMCPMC7571340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.