ArticleInvestigative radiology2019
Impact of Treatment With Chelating Agents Depends on the Stability of Administered GBCAs: A Comparative Study in Rats.
Article in Investigative radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Fe-EOB-tCDTA] generates strong contrast in the blood but not in the liver, despite inhibiting cellular [Gd-EOB-DTPA]European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Efficient segmentation of active and inactive plaques in FLAIR-images using DeepLabV3Plus SE with efficientnetb0 backbone in multiple sclerosis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Gadolinium: pharmacokinetics and toxicity in humans and laboratory animals following contrast agent administration.Archives of toxicology · 2022Review
- Retention of Gadolinium in Brain Parenchyma: Pathways for Speciation, Access, and Distribution. A Critical Review.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study investigated the potential effect of the chelating agent calcium trisodium pentetate (Ca-DTPA) on the urinary excretion of gadolinium and the subsequent elimination of gadolinium (Gd) in the brain after a single intravenous administration of either a linear (gadodiamide) or a macrocyclic (gadobutrol) Gd-based contrast agent in rats. MATERIALS AND
methodsRats received either a single injection of gadodiamide or gadobutrol (1.8 mmol/kg, each) or saline (n = 18 per group). Seven weeks after the injection, 6 animals of each group were killed before the treatment period. From the remaining 12 animals, 6 received either 3 intravenous injections of Ca-DTPA (180 μmol/kg) or saline. Urine was collected daily for 3 days after each infusion. Gadolinium measurements by ICP-MS were performed in urine and tissue samples.
resultsIn animals that initially received the linear gadodiamide, Ca-DTPA infusion increased the urinary excretion of Gd by a factor of 10 (cumulative amount of 114 ± 21 nmol Gd vs 10 ± 4 nmol Gd after saline infusion, P ≤ 0.0001). In contrast, animals that received the macrocyclic gadobutrol exhibited a higher spontaneous urinary excretion of Gd (33 ± 12 nmol after saline infusion) and Ca-DTPA had no impact (30 ± 11 nmol Gd, P = 0.68).The urinary excretion of Gd was associated with Gd brain content. Seven weeks after the initial Gd-based contrast agent administration, a total amount of 0.74 ± 0.053 nmol Gd was quantified in the brain after administration of gadodiamide. The Gd brain burden was partially reduced at the end of the treatment period in the animals that were repeatedly infused with Ca-DTPA (0.56 ± 0.13 nmol Gd, P = 0.009) but not with saline (0.66 ± 0.081 nmol, P = 0.32). In contrast, the total amount of macrocyclic gadobutrol measured in the brain was lower (0.11 ± 0.029 nmol Gd) and still spontaneously cleared during the 3-week saline infusion period (0.057 ± 0.019 nmol Gd (P = 0.003). Gadolinium quantified in the brain after infusions with Ca-DTPA did not differ from saline-infused animals (0.049 ± 0.014 nmol Gd).
conclusionsAdministration of the chelating agent Ca-DTPA 7 weeks after injection of linear gadodiamide induced relevant urinary Gd excretion. In parallel, the Gd amount in the brain tissue decreased. This indicates a dechelated pool among the chemical Gd forms present in the rat brain after linear gadodiamide administration that can be mobilized by chelation with Ca-DTPA. In contrast, Ca-DTPA did not mobilize Gd in animals that received macrocyclic gadobutrol, indicating that the Gd measured is intact gadobutrol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.