ArticleEar and hearing
Online Machine Learning Audiometry.
Article in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI-Based Measurement Tools for Intrinsic Capacity in Older Adults: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Perspectives of audiologists in China on artificial intelligence in clinical practice and professional identity: a qualitative study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Hearing health professionals' attitudes and perceived skills toward artificial intelligence.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Peripheral Vestibular System due to Inner Ear Barotrauma in the Hyperbaric Environment.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025Article
- Performance and reliability evaluation of an improved machine learning-based pure-tone audiometry with automated masking.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2025Article
- Behavior recognition technology based on deep learning used in pediatric behavioral audiometry.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Allied Health Professionals' Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in the Clinical Setting: Cross-Sectional Survey.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Audiology: A Scoping Review of Current Applications and Future Directions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Understanding, experience and attitudes towards artificial intelligence technologies for clinical decision support in hearing health: a mixed-methods survey of healthcare professionals in the UK.The Journal of laryngology and otology · 2024Article
- Digital Therapeutics in Hearing Healthcare: Evidence-Based Review.Journal of audiology & otology · 2024Article
- Serial Monitoring of the Audiogram in Hearing Conservation using Gaussian Processes.Frontiers in audiology and otology · 2024Article
- Active transfer learning for audiogram estimation.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Article
- Identifying quality responses using an analysis of response times: the RTcutoff function in R.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- In-situ hearing threshold estimation using Gaussian process classification.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Application of P4 (Predictive, Preventive, Personalized, Participatory) Approach to Occupational Medicine.La Medicina del lavoro · 2022Review
- Digital Approaches to Automated and Machine Learning Assessments of Hearing: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Editorial: Digital hearing healthcare.Frontiers in digital health · 2022Article
- Clinical comparison of two automated audiometry procedures.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Comprehensive molecular-genetic analysis of mid-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Tele-Audiology: Current State and Future Directions.Frontiers in digital health · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesA confluence of recent developments in cloud computing, real-time web audio and machine learning psychometric function estimation has made wide dissemination of sophisticated turn-key audiometric assessments possible. The authors have combined these capabilities into an online (i.e., web-based) pure-tone audiogram estimator intended to empower researchers and clinicians with advanced hearing tests without the need for custom programming or special hardware. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy and reliability of this new online machine learning audiogram method relative to a commonly used hearing threshold estimation technique also implemented online for the first time in the same platform.
designThe authors performed air conduction pure-tone audiometry on 21 participants between the ages of 19 and 79 years (mean 41, SD 21) exhibiting a wide range of hearing abilities. For each ear, two repetitions of online machine learning audiogram estimation and two repetitions of online modified Hughson-Westlake ascending-descending audiogram estimation were acquired by an audiologist using the online software tools. The estimated hearing thresholds of these two techniques were compared at standard audiogram frequencies (i.e., 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 kHz).
resultsThe two threshold estimation methods delivered very similar threshold estimates at standard audiogram frequencies. Specifically, the mean absolute difference between threshold estimates was 3.24 ± 5.15 dB. The mean absolute differences between repeated measurements of the online machine learning procedure and between repeated measurements of the Hughson-Westlake procedure were 2.85 ± 6.57 dB and 1.88 ± 3.56 dB, respectively. The machine learning method generated estimates of both threshold and spread (i.e., the inverse of psychometric slope) continuously across the entire frequency range tested from fewer samples on average than the modified Hughson-Westlake procedure required to estimate six discrete thresholds.
conclusionsOnline machine learning audiogram estimation in its current form provides all the information of conventional threshold audiometry with similar accuracy and reliability in less time. More importantly, however, this method provides additional audiogram details not provided by other methods. This standardized platform can be readily extended to bone conduction, masking, spectrotemporal modulation, speech perception, etc., unifying audiometric testing into a single comprehensive procedure efficient enough to become part of the standard audiologic workup.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.