Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30358500›Full record

ArticleJournal of health communication2018

Assessing the Impact of Conflicting Health Warning Information on Intentions to Use E-Cigarettes -An Application of the Heuristic-Systematic Model.

Sherri Jean Katz, Meghan Erkkinen, Bruce Lindgren, Dorothy Hatsukami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health communication, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effects of Modified Risk Tobacco Product Claims on Consumer Responses.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Adolescents' Perceptions of Harmfulness of Tobacco and Tobacco-like Products in Finland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. The Social Acceptance of Smart Health Services in Japan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sherri Jean Katza Hubbard School of Journalism and Mass Communication , University of Minnesota , Minneapolis , MN , USA.
Meghan Erkkinena Hubbard School of Journalism and Mass Communication , University of Minnesota , Minneapolis , MN , USA.
Bruce Lindgrenb Masonic Cancer Center , University of Minnesota , Minneapolis , MN , USA.
Dorothy Hatsukamic Department of Psychiatry and Director, Tobacco Research Programs , University of Minnesota , Minneapolis , MN , USA.

Funding

Tobacco Constituent and Biomarker Assessment CoreU19CA157345 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HATSUKAMI, DOROTHY K, SHIELDS, PETER G. · 2012 to 2016
$13.3M
Project 4: Effects of cigarette filter ventilation on cigarette appeal and preferences for combusted and noncombusted tobacco productsP01CA217806 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HATSUKAMI, DOROTHY K, SHIELDS, PETER G. · 2017 to 2022
$12.6M
E-Cigarette Warning Labels: Tests of Messages to Reduce Recreational Use Among AdolescentsR03DA043022 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI KATZ, SHERRI JEAN · 2017 to 2018
$220k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA217806NCI NIH HHS U19 CA157345NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA043022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine how nonsmokers perceive conflicting information when a modified risk statement is included along with a warning label on e-cigarette packages. We propose an application of the heuristic-systematic model to test whether this conflicting information leads to more or less active processing. As part of a larger inquiry into e-cigarette labeling, we present an experiment (n = 303) in which we test this model with nonsmokers, measuring ambiguity perceptions, counter-arguing, reduced effectiveness of the message, and behavioral intentions. Results demonstrate that the addition of a modified risk statement on the package with the warning label increases ambiguity perceptions which can lead to reduced effectiveness of warning labels and reduced behavioral intentions to avoid using e-cigarettes among nonsmokers. While the systematic and heuristic pathways are both explanatory, heuristic processing provides the better fit.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsIntentionTruth DisclosureAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProduct LabelingSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30358500
PMCPMC6988485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.