Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30358109›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of rheumatic diseases2019

Pharmacodynamic biomarkers and differential effects of TNF- and GM-CSF-targeting biologics in rheumatoid arthritis.

Xiang Guo, Shiliang Wang, Alex Godwood, David Close, Patricia C Ryan, Lorin K Roskos, Wendy I White

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of rheumatic diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Crosstalk between CD64EMBO molecular medicine · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. GM-CSF in inflammation.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiang GuoClinical Pharmacology & DMPK, MedImmune, Gaithersburg, Maryland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3307-2388
Shiliang WangClinical Pharmacology & DMPK, MedImmune, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Alex GodwoodClinical Development, MedImmune, Cambridge, UK.
David CloseClinical Development, MedImmune, Cambridge, UK.
Patricia C RyanBiologics Safety Assessment, MedImmune, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Lorin K RoskosClinical Pharmacology & DMPK, MedImmune, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Wendy I WhiteClinical Pharmacology & DMPK, MedImmune, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Amplimmune (United States) · USPredictImmune · GBCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of our study was to identify pharmacodynamic biomarkers and assess differential effects of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)- and non-TNF-targeting agents on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with an inadequate response to anti-TNF agents (anti-TNF-IR) in comparison with biologic-naïve patients.

methodsEARTH EXPLORER 2, a phase IIb trial, evaluated golimumab, an anti-TNF antibody, and mavrilimumab, an granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) receptor antibody, in disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-IR and anti-TNF-IR patients. Our current study assessed peripheral protein markers and gene expression levels in association with clinical response post-treatment in two disease strata.

resultsSerum proteomics results indicated the existence of specific pharmacodynamic markers for golimumab and mavrilimumab, regardless of prior anti-TNF treatment. In contrast, both antibodies induced early and sustained suppression of RA disease markers, including interleukin (IL)-6, C-reactive protein, IL2RA, and matrix metalloproteinase 1, in DMARD-IR patients. Golimumab-induced early changes rapidly returned toward baseline concentrations in anti-TNF-IR patients, whereas mavrilimumab-induced changes were maintained through to day 169. RNA sequencing demonstrated gene expression changes at day 169 after administration of mavrilimumab but not golimumab in anti-TNF-IR patients. Additionally, receiver operating characteristic curve and regression analysis showed the association of early IL-6 change and subsequent clinical responses to golimumab in anti-TNF-IR patients.

conclusionOur results revealed golimumab- and mavrilimumab-specific pharmacodynamic biomarkers, and demonstrated differential biomarker-treatment relationships in anti-TNF-IR and DMARD-IR patients, respectively. Early IL-6 change after anti-TNF antibody treatment may be a potential predictive biomarker for selection of different treatment regimens in anti-TNF-IR patients.

Indexed as

ProteomicsAdultAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiomarkers, PharmacologicalDouble-Blind MethodDrug MonitoringFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGenetic MarkersGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansInflammation MediatorsMaleAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsBiomarkers, PharmacologicalCSF2 protein, humanGenetic MarkersgolimumabGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorInflammation MediatorsmavrilimumabTumor Necrosis Factor-alphabiological therapiesbiomarkersGM-CSFrheumatoid arthritisTNF

Identifiers

PMID30358109
PMCPMC6587493
OpenAlexW2898404357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.