Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30357971›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical nursing2019

Nursing knowledge of essential maternal and newborn care in a high-mortality urban African setting: A cross-sectional study.

Georgina A V Murphy, David Gathara, Ann Mwaniki, Grace Nabea, Jacintah Mwachiro, Nancy Abuya, Mike English

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical nursing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Nurses in NICUs' views on nosocomial infection prevention.Journal of education and health promotion · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Georgina A V MurphyCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5978-483X
David GatharaKenya Medical Research Institute/Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Ann MwanikiKenya Medical Research Institute/Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Grace NabeaKenya Medical Research Institute/Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Jacintah MwachiroKenya Medical Research Institute/Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Nancy AbuyaKenya Medical Research Institute/Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Mike EnglishCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Kenya Medical Research Institute · KE

Funding

Health Systems Research Initiative jointgrant provided by the Department for International Development Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)Medical Research Council MR/M015386/1MedicalResearch Council (MRC) data collectionand analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.Wellcome Trust 106475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo assess the knowledge of nurses of national guidelines for emergency maternity, routine newborn and small and sick newborn care in Nairobi County, Kenya.

backgroundThe vast majority of women deliver in a health facility in Nairobi. Yet, maternal and neonatal mortality remain high. Ensuring competency of health workers, in providing essential maternal and newborn interventions in health facilities will be key if further progress is to be made in reducing maternal and neonatal mortality in low-resource settings.

designCross-sectional survey.

methodsQuestionnaires comprised of clinical vignettes and direct questions and were administered in 2015-2016 to nurses (n = 125 in 31 facilities) on duty in maternity and newborn units in public and private facilities providing 24/7 inpatient neonatal services. Composite knowledge scores were calculated and presented as weighted means. Associations were explored using regression. STROBE guidelines were followed.

resultsNurses scored best for knowledge on active management of the mother after birth and immediate routine newborn care. Performance was worst for questions on infant resuscitation, checking signs and symptoms of sick newborns, and managing hypertension in pregnancy. Overall knowledge of care for sick newborns was particularly low (score 0.62 of 1). Across all areas assessed, nurses who had received training since qualifying performed better than those who had not. Poorly resourced and low case-load facilities had lower average knowledge scores compared with better-resourced and busier facilities.

conclusionOverall, we estimate that 31% of maternity patients, 3% of newborns and 39% of small and sick newborns are being cared for in an environment where nursing knowledge is very low (score <0.6). RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Focus on periodic training, ensuring retention of knowledge and skills among health workers in low-case load setting, and bridging the know-do gap may help to improve the quality of care delivered to mothers and newborns in Kenya.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesKenyaMaternal-Child Health ServicesNursing StaffPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesUrban PopulationAfricaemergency obstetric and neonatal carehealth facilitiesKenyamaternal caremidwiferyneonatal careneonatal nursingNewborn carenursing knowledge

Identifiers

PMID30357971
PMCPMC6472564
OpenAlexW2898312273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.