ArticleImmunology2019
Plasticity of antimicrobial and phagocytic programs in human macrophages.
Article in Immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Glucose Metabolic Reprogramming of Macrophages AgainstImmunoTargets and therapy · 2025Review
- Eschar dissolution and the immunoregulator effect of keratinase on burn wounds.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Single-cell RNA transcriptome landscape of hepatocytes and non-parenchymal cells in healthy and NAFLD mouse liver.iScience · 2021Article
- Role of Indole-3-Acetic Acid in NAFLD Amelioration After Sleeve Gastrectomy.Obesity surgery · 2021Article
- HDAC3 inhibitor RGFP966 controls bacterial growth and modulates macrophage signaling during Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection.Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2021Article
- Vitamin D3 as Potential Treatment Adjuncts for COVID-19.Nutrients · 2020Review
- TLR-2-mediated metabolic reprogramming participates in polyene phosphatidylcholine-mediated inhibition of M1 macrophage polarization.Immunologic research · 2020Article
- Review
- Article
- Liver Macrophages: Old Dogmas and New Insights.Hepatology communications · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Macrophage (MΦ) polarization is triggered during the innate immune response to defend against microbial pathogens, but can also contribute to disease pathogenesis. In a previous study, we found that interleukin-15 (IL-15) -derived classically activated macrophages (M1 MΦ) have enhanced antimicrobial activity, whereas IL-10-derived alternatively activated macrophages (M2 MΦ) were highly phagocytic but lacked antimicrobial activity. Given that the ability to modulate MΦ polarization from M2 MΦ to M1 MΦ may promote a more effective immune response to infection, we investigated the plasticity of these MΦ programs. Addition of IL-10 to M1 MΦ induced M2-like MΦ, but IL-15 had little effect on M2 MΦ. We determined the set of immune receptors that are present on M2 MΦ, elucidating two candidates for inducing plasticity of M2 MΦ, Toll-like receptor 1 (TLR1) and interferonγ (IFN-γ) receptor 1. Stimulation of M2 MΦ with TLR2/1 ligand (TLR2/1L) or IFN-γ alone was not sufficient to alter M2 MΦ phenotype or function. However, co-addition of TLR2/1L and IFN-γ re-educated M2 MΦ towards the M1 MΦ phenotype, with a decrease in the phagocytosis of lipids and mycobacteria, as well as recovery of the vitamin-D-dependent antimicrobial pathway compared with M2 MΦ maintained in polarizing conditions. Similarly, treatment of M2 MΦ with both TLR2/1L and anti-IL-10 neutralizing antibodies led to polarization to the M1-like MΦ phenotype and function. Together, our data demonstrate an approach to induce MΦ plasticity that provides the potential for re-educating MΦ function in human mycobacterial disease to promote host defense and limit pathogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.