ArticleNeuroinformatics2019
Cocaine-Induced Preference Conditioning: a Machine Vision Perspective.
Article in Neuroinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perineuronal Net Microscopy: From Brain Pathology to Artificial Intelligence.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Time-dependent regulation of perineuronal nets in the cerebellar cortex during abstinence of cocaine-self administration.Psychopharmacology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Existing work on drug-induced synaptic changes has shown that the expression of perineuronal nets (PNNs) at the cerebellar cortex can be regulated by cocaine-related memory. However, these studies on animals have mostly relied on limited manually-driven procedures, and lack some more rigorous statistical approaches and more automated techniques. In this work, established methods from computer vision and machine learning are considered to build stronger evidence of those previous findings. To that end, an image descriptor is designed to characterize PNNs images; unsupervised learning (clustering) is used to automatically find distinctive patterns of PNNs; and supervised learning (classification) is adopted for predicting the experiment group of the mice from their PNN images. Experts in neurobiology, who were not aware of the underlying computational procedures, were asked to describe the patterns emerging from the automatically found clusters, and their descriptions were found to align surprisingly well with the two types of PNN images revealed from previous studies, namely strong and weak PNNs. Furthermore, when the set of PNN images corresponding to every mice in the saline (control) group and the conditioned (experimental) group were characterized using a bag-of-words representation, and subject to supervised learning (saline vs conditioned mice), the high classification results suggest the ability of the proposed representation and procedures in recognizing these groups. Therefore, despite the limited size of the dataset (1,032 PNN images of 6 saline and 6 conditioned mice), the results support existing evidence on the drug-related brain plasticity, while providing higher objectivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30357708What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.