ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2019
Functional connectivity of specific resting-state networks predicts trust and reciprocity in the trust game.
Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Music and trust formation: a scoping review of neurobiological convergence and research priorities.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Pooled it
- Trust Emerges From Shared Attention: Behavioural and Neural Evidence From Dual EEG Hyperscanning.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- Impaired cooperation and prosocial learning during trust game in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2025Article
- Callousness, exploitativeness, and tracking of cooperation incentives in the human default network.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- The connectome-based prediction of trust propensity in older adults: A resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Trust game, survey trust, are they correlated? Evidence from China.Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Economic and social values in the brain: evidence from lesions to the human ventromedial prefrontal cortex.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Review
- Intrinsic brain activity patterns across large-scale networks predict reciprocity propensity.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- Intrinsic functional connectivity of the frontoparietal network predicts inter-individual differences in the propensity for costly third-party punishment.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2021Article
- Loneliness and the Social Brain: How Perceived Social Isolation Impairs Human Interactions.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021Article
- Multi-Round Trust Game Quantifies Inter-Individual Differences in Social Exchange from Adolescence to Adulthood.Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2021Article
- Neural mechanisms of social learning and decision-making.Science China. Life sciences · 2021Review
- Prediction of trust propensity from intrinsic brain morphology and functional connectome.Human brain mapping · 2021Article
- Effects of Inequality on Trust and Reciprocity: An Experiment With Real Effort.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Network connectivity predicts language processing in healthy adults.Human brain mapping · 2020Article
- Effects of a dopamine agonist on trusting behaviors in females.Psychopharmacology · 2020Article
- The influence of relationship closeness on default-mode network connectivity during social interactions.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2020Article
- The Critical Role of the Right Dorsal and Ventral Anterior Insula in Reciprocity: Evidence From the Trust and Ultimatum Games.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- Trust Games and Beyond.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Economic games are used to elicit a social, conflictual situation in which people have to make decisions weighing self-related and collective interests. Combining these games with task-based fMRI has been shown to be successful in investigating the neural underpinnings of cooperative behaviors. However, it remains elusive to which extent resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) represents an individual's propensity to prosocial behaviors in the context of economic games. Here, we investigated whether task-free RSFC predicts individual differences in the propensity to trust and reciprocate in a one-round trust game (TG) employing a prediction-analytics framework. Our results demonstrated that individual differences in the propensity to trust and reciprocity could be predicted by individual differences in the RSFC. Different subnetworks of the default-mode network associated with mentalizing exclusively predicted trust and reciprocity. Moreover, reciprocity was further predicted by the frontoparietal and cingulo-opercular networks associated with cognitive control and saliency, respectively. Our results contribute to a better understanding of how complex social behaviors are enrooted in large-scale intrinsic brain dynamics, which may represent neuromarkers for impairment of prosocial behavior in mental health disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30357662What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.