Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30357649›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2019

Prevalence of Drug Prescriptions and Potential Safety in Patients with Cirrhosis: A Retrospective Real-World Study.

Rianne A Weersink, Katja Taxis, Joost P H Drenth, Eline Houben, Herold J Metselaar, Sander D Borgsteede

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rianne A WeersinkDepartment of Clinical Decision Support, Health Base Foundation, Papiermolen 36, 3994 DK, Houten, The Netherlands. r.a.weersink@rug.nl.
Katja TaxisDepartment of Pharmacy, Unit of Pharmacotherapy, -Epidemiology and Economics, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Joost P H DrenthDepartment of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Eline HoubenPHARMO Institute for Drug Outcomes Research, Van Deventerlaan 30-40, 3528 AE, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Herold J MetselaarDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sander D BorgsteedeDepartment of Clinical Decision Support, Health Base Foundation, Papiermolen 36, 3994 DK, Houten, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLPharmo Institute · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatients with cirrhosis are at risk for adverse drug reactions (ADRs) due to altered pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. We aimed to determine the prevalence of drug prescriptions and the potential safety of these prescriptions in a real-world cohort of patients with cirrhosis.

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study based on linked real-world data from the Out-patient Pharmacy Database and the Hospitalisation Database of the PHARMO Database Network. Patients with a diagnosis of cirrhosis between January 1998 and December 2015 were included. Follow-up ended when the patient underwent a liver transplant, died, transferred out of the database, or on 31 December 2015. Prescription data were derived from a community pharmacy database and were compared with our previously developed safety recommendations for 209 drugs.

resultsIn total, 5618 patients were included and followed for a median of 3 years (interquartile range [IQR] 1-7). In the first year after the diagnosis, patients used a median of nine drugs (IQR 5-14), with proton pump inhibitors (prevalence 53.9%), aldosterone antagonists (43.6%), and sulfonamide diuretics (41.3%) being the most commonly used drug groups. Almost half (48.3%) of 102,927 prescriptions consisted of drugs with a safety recommendation. The prevalence of potentially unsafe drug use was 60.0% during the total follow-up. Three nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were among the five most commonly used potentially unsafe drugs.

conclusionsPatients with cirrhosis use a large number of drugs. Almost two-thirds of patients in our cohort used potentially unsafe drugs. To prevent ADRs in these frail patients, personalised pharmacotherapy is necessary.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDatabases, FactualDrug PrescriptionsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHospitalizationHumansLiver CirrhosisMaleMiddle AgedPrescription DrugsPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesPrescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID30357649
PMCPMC6450857
OpenAlexW2898399006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.