Trial reportEuropean journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics2019
Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Azithromycin Eyedrops in Tears Following Single-Dose Topical Administration in Healthy Volunteers.
Trial report in European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Influential predictors of azithromycin pharmacokinetics: a systematic review of population pharmacokinetics.Annals of medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Significant Predictors of Azithromycin in Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis: A Systematic Review.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThe disposition of azithromycin in the human eye following topical administration has not been fully explored. Population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) modeling can allow useful conclusions to be drawn based on limited tear sampling data. The aim of this study was therefore to develop and evaluate a PopPK model of azithromycin eyedrops in tears, investigate typical model parameters, and identify potential covariates following single-dose ocular instillation.
methodsA total of 84 tear samples were obtained from 42 healthy volunteers at seven time points over 24 h following topical administration of azithromycin eyedrops (2.5 mL/25 mg). Azithromycin concentrations in the tears were determined using a validated LC-MS/MS assay. PopPK analysis was performed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Intraocular pressure, tear secretion measurement, age, and gender were evaluated as possible covariates. Bootstrap and visual predictive checks were used simultaneously to evaluate the PopPK model. The dosage regimen was further estimated based on Monte Carlo simulation and the area under the curve/minimal inhibitory concentration.
resultsA linear two-compartment first-order elimination model was found to best describe the pharmacokinetic profile of azithromycin in tears. None of the covariates had a significant influence on the typical model parameters. The final PopPK model was demonstrated to be suitable and effective according to bootstrap and visual predictive checks. Twice-daily instillation of azithromycin eyedrops would appear to provide the required antibacterial activity.
conclusionA proposed linear two-compartment PopPK model of azithromycin eyedrops was found to be effective at describing the disposition of azithromycin in tears after ocular instillation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.