Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30357556›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2019

Opioid switching and variability in response in pain cancer patients.

O Corli, A Roberto, N Corsi, F Galli, M Pizzuto

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Integrating pharmacogenomics into precision pain management.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. A preliminary study of the effect of naldemedine tosylate on opioid-induced nausea and vomiting.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

O CorliPain and Palliative Care Research Unit, Oncology Department, Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research IRCCS, Via G. La Masa 19, Milan, Italy.
A RobertoPain and Palliative Care Research Unit, Oncology Department, Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research IRCCS, Via G. La Masa 19, Milan, Italy.
N CorsiPain and Palliative Care Research Unit, Oncology Department, Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research IRCCS, Via G. La Masa 19, Milan, Italy. nicole.corsi@marionegri.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9577-2753
F GalliMethodology for Clinical Research Laboratory, Oncology Department, Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
M PizzutoPalliative Care and Pain Therapy Unit, ASST Nord Milano, E. Bassini Hospital, Cinisello Balsamo, Italy.
Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research · ITMilano Metropoli Development Agency · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOpioid switching is a possible strategy for inadequate analgesia or unmanageable side effects. Its effectiveness ranges from 50 to 90% and is still debated. PURPOSE: We analyzed the impact of opioid switching in a cancer pain population treated with strong opioids for pain.

methodsThis is a post hoc analysis from a multicenter, randomized, four-arm, controlled, phase IV clinical trial. Outcome variables included the percentages of switches, the reasons for the switch, the dose changes before and after the switch, depending on the starting opioid, the response in case of inadequate analgesia, and unmanageable toxicity, and the variability of response among and within patients.

resultsWe analyzed 498 patients. The opioid was switched in 79 patients (15.9%) 87 times, mainly for uncontrolled pain (52.3%), adverse opioid reactions (22.1%), both of these (4.8%), and dysphagia (20.8%). The reasons for switching varied depending on the starting opioid. Pain reduction was good after 51.45% of switches and control of opioid side effects was good after 43.5%. The relief of opioid-induced toxicity varied among adverse events and within each patient. The daily doses were higher after switching oral opioids and lower after transdermal drugs.

conclusionsHalf of the patients who underwent switching experienced improved relief of pain or amelioration of opioid toxicity. The switch can help in the management of some cases but with many limits and uncertainties.

Indexed as

AgedAnalgesics, OpioidCancer PainFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleAnalgesics, OpioidCancer painOpioid switchingPain reliefToxicity relief

Identifiers

PMID30357556
OpenAlexW2898207866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.