Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30357537›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2019

Financial toxicity is more than costs of care: the relationship between employment and financial toxicity in long-term cancer survivors.

Alison Pearce, Bianca Tomalin, Billingsley Kaambwa, Nicole Horevoorts, Saskia Duijts, Floortje Mols, Lonneke van de Poll-Franse, Bogda Koczwara

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
37.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 158 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The economic impact of cancer diagnosis to individuals and their families: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Financial toxicity and employment status in cancer survivors. A systematic literature review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Financial toxicity associated with a cancer diagnosis in publicly funded healthcare countries: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Financial toxicity among breast cancer survivors receiving care during the pandemic.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Factors associated with employment outcomes in cancer survivors: a systematic scoping review spanning a decade of international research.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Associations between financial toxicity, health-related quality of life, and well-being in Indonesian patients with breast cancer.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  18. Assessment of financial toxicity in patients with cancer in Slovenia.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  19. Financial toxicity and associated factors among cancer patients attending public hospitals in Ethiopia.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Alison PearceCentre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, NSW, 2007, Australia. Alison.pearce@chere.uts.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-5690-9542
Bianca TomalinFlinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Billingsley KaambwaHealth Economics Unit, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Nicole HorevoortsDepartment of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Saskia DuijtsDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Floortje MolsDepartment of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Lonneke van de Poll-FranseDepartment of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Bogda KoczwaraFlinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Flinders University · AUTilburg University · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to examine the relationship between employment and financial toxicity by examining the prevalence of, and factors associated with, financial toxicity among cancer survivors.

methodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of a sub-sample from the Dutch Patient Reported Outcomes Following Initial Treatment and Long-term Evaluation of Survivorship (PROFILES) registry. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analysis and logistic regression were used.

resultsA total of 2931 participants with diverse cancer types were included in the analysis with a mean age of 55 years (range 18 to 65). Nearly half (49%) of participants were employed at the time of the survey, and 22% reported financial toxicity. Those who were not employed were at greater risk of financial toxicity (27% vs 16%, p < 0.001), and this did not vary according to time since diagnosis. The odds of reporting financial toxicity were greater for participants who were male, younger, unmarried, with low education, low socioeconomic status, or without paid employment. Those with basal cell carcinoma had lower risk of financial toxicity, while those with haematological or colorectal cancer had highest risk of financial toxicity.

conclusionsThis research confirms that unemployment is significantly associated with financial toxicity and that those with limited financial resources are most at risk. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Increased awareness of financial toxicity and its associated factors among clinicians may result in improved screening and appropriate referrals for support services. The implementation of effective multidisciplinary return to work interventions, as part of standard cancer survivorship care, may reduce financial toxicity among cancer survivors.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessEmploymentHealth ExpendituresAdolescentAdultAgedCancer SurvivorsFemaleHumansIncomeMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsRegistriesRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesCancerCostEmploymentFinancial toxicitySurvivorshipWork

Identifiers

PMID30357537
OpenAlexW2898244509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.