ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2019
Does anti-Mullerian hormone predict the outcome of further pregnancies in idiopathic recurrent miscarriage? A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Decreased Ovarian Reserves With an Increasing Number of Previous Early Miscarriages: A Retrospective Analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- The Prevalence and Impact of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in Recurrent Miscarriage: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate whether anti-Mullerian hormone, basal follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, estradiol, and female age would predict future outcomes in women with idiopathic recurrent miscarriage.
methodsOne hundred and sixteen women with idiopathic recurrent miscarriage were retrospectively included. Luteal support with or without a combined treatment regimen for idiopathic recurrent miscarriage was applied in a tertiary-care center in Vienna. Occurrence and outcome of further pregnancies were analyzed.
resultsWithin a median follow-up duration of 42.3 months, 94 women (81.0%) achieved one or more pregnancies. Further miscarriages occurred in 47 patients in whom only a higher number of previous miscarriages was predictive (OR 3.568, 95% CI 1.457-8.738; p = 0.005). Fifty-seven women had a live birth > 23 + 0 gestational weeks. In a multivariate analysis, age (OR 0.920, 95% CI 0.859-0.986; p = 0.019) and the number of previous miscarriages (OR 0.403, 95% CI 0.193-0.841; p = 0.016), but not AMH (OR 1.191, 95% CI 0.972-1.461; p = 0.091) were significantly predictive.
conclusionAMH seems of either no or only minor relevance for the prediction of further miscarriages and live birth in women with idiopathic recurrent miscarriage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.