Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30357492›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2019

Medial open wedge vs. lateral closed wedge high tibial osteotomy - Indications based on the findings of patellar height, leg length, torsional correction and clinical outcome in one hundred cases.

Felix Ferner, Christoph Lutter, Joerg Dickschas, Wolf Strecker

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. No benefits of knee osteotomy patient's specific instrumentation in experienced surgeon hands.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. [Comparison of two osteotomies in the treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2021
    Article
  7. Clinical course and outcomes of simultaneous-versus staged-bilateral medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy.Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Felix FernerKlinik Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Bamberg, Buger Str. 80, 96049, Bamberg, Germany. felix.ferner@sozialstiftung-bamberg.de.
Christoph LutterKlinik Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Bamberg, Buger Str. 80, 96049, Bamberg, Germany.
Joerg DickschasKlinik Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Bamberg, Buger Str. 80, 96049, Bamberg, Germany.
Wolf StreckerKlinik Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Bamberg, Buger Str. 80, 96049, Bamberg, Germany.
Sozialstiftung Bamberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMedial open wedge (MOW) and lateral closed wedge (LCW) osteotomies are established methods to treat medial gonarthritis. Advantages and differences in the outcome of the two techniques have been discussed controversially and there is still no precise recommendation for either technique. We now aimed to assess the effect of each technique on tibial slope (TS), patella height (PH) and leg length discrepancy.

methodIn a study of 50 consecutive cases of MOW and 50 of LCW osteotomies were registered. The decision for either technique was made pre-operatively according to an algorithm. Demographic data, operation procedures (time of operation, correction angle, torsional correction) and measurement of patellar height, tibial slope, leg length discrepancy, clinical outcome after one year and bone and wound healing were obtained. Pre- and post-operative values were compared between the two groups.

resultsIn absence of randomization demographic data demonstrate comparability of the two groups. No difference in bone and wound healing, time of operation and clinical outcome was seen. In the MOW group PH decreased significantly, no relevant alteration of PH was detected in the LCW group. In the latter group a statistically significant decrease of TS compared to a slightly decrease in the MOW group was recorded post-operatively. A significant leg lengthening with the MOW and shortening of the leg with the LCW method can be achieved. DISCUSSION: With respect to similar results in operating procedures, bone and wound healing and clinical outcome decision making factors for either technique should be leg length discrepancy and torsional deformities. Changes of PH and TS have to be known and may influence the technique of osteotomy in cases of patella infera / alta or borderline PH.

conclusionAn algorithm for valgus high tibial osteotomies based on TS, PH and leg length discrepancy may be proposed.

Indexed as

OsteotomyTorsoAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneePatellaPostoperative PeriodTibiaTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultGonarthritisOsteotomySurgical techniqueVarus deformity

Identifiers

PMID30357492
OpenAlexW2898352279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.