Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30357477›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2018

Sequential inoculum of Hanseniaspora guilliermondii and Saccharomyces cerevisiae for winemaking Campanino on an industrial scale.

Silvia Jane Lombardi, Gianfranco Pannella, Massimo Iorizzo, Maria Victoria Moreno-Arribas, Patrizio Tremonte, Mariantonietta Succi, Elena Sorrentino, Vincenzo Macciola, Massimo Di Renzo, Raffaele Coppola

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Profiling Potential Wine Yeast Starters fromJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Selection of Non-Microorganisms · 2025
    Article
  3. Effects ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Microbial dynamics in industrial-scale wine fermentation employingJournal of food science and technology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Effect of Biofilm Formation byFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Silvia Jane LombardiDepartment of Agriculture, Environmental and Food Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, CB, Italy.
Gianfranco PannellaDepartment of Agriculture, Environmental and Food Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, CB, Italy.
Massimo IorizzoDepartment of Agriculture, Environmental and Food Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, CB, Italy. iorizzo@unimol.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8515-900X
Maria Victoria Moreno-ArribasInstituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Alimentación (CIAL), CSIC-UAM, C/Nicolás Cabrera 9. Campus de Cantoblanco, CEI UAM+CSIC, 28049, Madrid, Spain.
Patrizio TremonteDepartment of Agriculture, Environmental and Food Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, CB, Italy.
Mariantonietta SucciDepartment of Agriculture, Environmental and Food Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, CB, Italy.
Elena SorrentinoDepartment of Agriculture, Environmental and Food Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, CB, Italy.
Vincenzo MacciolaDepartment of Agriculture, Environmental and Food Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, CB, Italy.
Massimo Di RenzoDepartment of Agriculture, Environmental and Food Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, CB, Italy.
Raffaele CoppolaDepartment of Agriculture, Environmental and Food Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, CB, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, the effect of sequential inoculation with non-Saccharomyces (Hanseniaspora guilliermondii) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast on the distinctive characteristics of the Campanino white wine was investigated. For this purpose, three independent winemaking experiments were carried out on an industrial scale (batches A, B and C). In detail, the first one was carried out using the sequential inoculation technique while the other two, using a S. cerevisiae single-strain starter or no inoculation representing the control batches. Microbiological and chemical parameters and sensorial profiles of the wines were defined. Interestingly, the results showed that when sequential cultures (H. guilliermondii in a sequential mixture with S. cerevisiae) were used, a better wine aroma and quality was observed. More specifically, the wine obtained by sequential inoculation showed lower acetic acid values and enhanced volatile profiles than the wine from the control batches. Finally, sensorial analysis confirmed that the sequential cultures led to an improvement in wine flavour. Therefore, results suggest that the sequential inoculation using non-Saccharomyces and Saccharomyces yeast represents a biotechnological practice that can improve the quality features of traditional white wine. It has been shown for the first time that on an industrial scale H. guilliermondii could be used in sequential inoculum with S. cerevisiae in making white Campanino wine.

Indexed as

Acetic AcidBatch Cell Culture TechniquesBioreactorsCulture MediaFermentationHanseniasporaIndustrial MicrobiologyKineticsOdorantsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeVolatile Organic CompoundsWineAcetic AcidCulture MediaVolatile Organic CompoundsCampanino white wineH. guilliermondiiIndustrial-scale winemakingNon-SaccharomycesSequential inoculation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.