ArticleDer Pathologe2018
[Pathological-anatomical diagnosis according to the German lung cancer guideline 2018].
Article in Der Pathologe, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Immunohistochemical and molecular pathological diagnosis of lung carcinoma].Der Pathologe · 2020Review
- RNA-Based Detection of Gene Fusions in Formalin-Fixed and Paraffin-Embedded Solid Cancer Samples.Cancers · 2019Article
- [Immunophenotyping of lung tumors : An update].Der Pathologe · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The German S3-guideline on prevention, diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of lung cancer, published in February 2018, expands on the 2010 guideline to include a total of 19 recommendations and statements regarding the "processing of lung resection specimens (tumor resection specimens)", "processing of lymph nodes", "histo-pathological typing and immunophenotype", "extent of tumor growth in resection specimens", "resection margins" or "R-classification", "grade of malignancy (grading)", "regression grading" as well as the "examination of molecular targets". The statements regarding the analysis of molecular targets result from the diagnostic requirements of the current targeted therapy of advanced lung cancer. At the same time, a pathological-anatomical diagnosis according to the current S3-guideline fulfills all corresponding requirements in certified lung cancer centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30357460What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.