Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30357420›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2019

Genomes OnLine database (GOLD) v.7: updates and new features.

Supratim Mukherjee, Dimitri Stamatis, Jon Bertsch, Galina Ovchinnikova, Hema Y Katta, Alejandro Mojica, I-Min A Chen, Nikos C Kyrpides, Tbk Reddy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Standardized naming of microbiome samples in Genomes OnLine Database.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Supratim MukherjeeProkaryotic Super Program, DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598, USA.
Dimitri StamatisProkaryotic Super Program, DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598, USA.
Jon BertschProkaryotic Super Program, DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598, USA.
Galina OvchinnikovaProkaryotic Super Program, DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598, USA.
Hema Y KattaProkaryotic Super Program, DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598, USA.
Alejandro MojicaProkaryotic Super Program, DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598, USA.
I-Min A ChenProkaryotic Super Program, DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598, USA.
Nikos C KyrpidesProkaryotic Super Program, DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598, USA.
Tbk ReddyProkaryotic Super Program, DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Genomes Online Database (GOLD) (https://gold.jgi.doe.gov) is an open online resource, which maintains an up-to-date catalog of genome and metagenome projects in the context of a comprehensive list of associated metadata. Information in GOLD is organized into four levels: Study, Biosample/Organism, Sequencing Project and Analysis Project. Currently GOLD hosts information on 33 415 Studies, 49 826 Biosamples, 313 324 Organisms, 215 881 Sequencing Projects and 174 454 Analysis Projects with a total of 541 metadata fields, of which 80 are based on controlled vocabulary (CV) terms. GOLD provides a user-friendly web interface to browse sequencing projects and launch advanced search tools across four classification levels. Users submit metadata on a wide range of Sequencing and Analysis Projects in GOLD before depositing sequence data to the Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG) system for analysis. GOLD conforms with and supports the rules set by the Genomic Standards Consortium (GSC) Minimum Information standards. The current version of GOLD (v.7) has seen the number of projects and associated metadata increase exponentially over the years. This paper provides an update on the current status of GOLD and highlights the new features added over the last two years.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticGene OntologyGenomicsSoftware

Identifiers

PMID30357420
PMCPMC6323969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.