ArticleNucleic acids research2018
Active site residue identity regulates cleavage preference of LAGLIDADG homing endonucleases.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modular determinants of cleavage preference in GIY-YIG nucleases revealed by block-based DNA shuffling and directed evolution.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Comprehensive analysis of insertion sequences within rRNA genes of CPR bacteria and biochemical characterization of a homing endonuclease encoded by these sequences.Journal of bacteriology · 2024Article
- Intein-based thermoregulated meganucleases for containment of genetic material.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Group I introns: Structure, splicing and their applications in medical mycology.Genetics and molecular biology · 2024Article
- Neighboring inteins interfere with one another's homing capacity.PNAS nexus · 2023Article
- A generalizable Cas9/sgRNA prediction model using machine transfer learning with small high-quality datasets.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Current technological interventions and applications of CRISPR/Cas for crop improvement.Molecular biology reports · 2022Review
- Prokaryotic Argonaute Proteins as a Tool for Biotechnology.Molecular biology · 2022Article
- Gene Editing in Pluripotent Stem Cells and Their Derived Organoids.Stem cells international · 2021Review
- Optimization of Protein Thermostability and Exploitation of Recognition Behavior to Engineer Altered Protein-DNA Recognition.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2020Article
- Modifying a covarying protein-DNA interaction changes substrate preference of a site-specific endonuclease.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- Genome-Editing Technologies: Concept, Pros, and Cons of Various Genome-Editing Techniques and Bioethical Concerns for Clinical Application.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
LAGLIDADG homing endonucleases (meganucleases) are site-specific mobile endonucleases that can be adapted for genome-editing applications. However, one problem when reprogramming meganucleases on non-native substrates is indirect readout of DNA shape and flexibility at the central 4 bases where cleavage occurs. To understand how the meganuclease active site regulates DNA cleavage, we used functional selections and deep sequencing to profile the fitness landscape of 1600 I-LtrI and I-OnuI active site variants individually challenged with 67 substrates with central 4 base substitutions. The wild-type active site was not optimal for cleavage on many substrates, including the native I-LtrI and I-OnuI targets. Novel combinations of active site residues not observed in known meganucleases supported activity on substrates poorly cleaved by the wild-type enzymes. Strikingly, combinations of E or D substitutions in the two metal-binding residues greatly influenced cleavage activity, and E184D variants had a broadened cleavage profile. Analyses of I-LtrI E184D and the wild-type proteins co-crystallized with the non-cognate AACC central 4 sequence revealed structural differences that correlated with kinetic constants for cleavage of individual DNA strands. Optimizing meganuclease active sites to enhance cleavage of non-native central 4 target sites is a straightforward addition to engineering workflows that will expand genome-editing applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.