ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019
BatchI: Batch effect Identification in high-throughput screening data using a dynamic programming algorithm.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Blood biomarkers predict conversion from cognitively stable to mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer's disease in Down syndrome at 16-month follow-up in ABC-DS.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Biomarker identification of triple negative breast cancer subtypes using machine learning.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- A review of deep learning models for the prediction of chromatin interactions with DNA and epigenomic profiles.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- Deep centroid: a general deep cascade classifier for biomedical omics data classification.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Evaluation of zero counts to better understand the discrepancies between bulk and single-cell RNA-Seq platforms.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- Local data commons: the sleeping beauty in the community of data commons.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Machine learning model for predicting Major Depressive Disorder using RNA-Seq data: optimization of classification approach.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2022Article
- Perspectives for better batch effect correction in mass-spectrometry-based proteomics.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Review
- Unbiased comparison and modularization identify time-related transcriptomic reprogramming in exercised rat cartilage: Integrated data mining and experimental validation.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Translational precision medicine: an industry perspective.Journal of translational medicine · 2021Review
- Biological Perspectives of RNA-Sequencing Experimental Design.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Article
- Promising targets and drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: a module-based and cumulatively scoring approach.Bone & joint research · 2020Article
- Clarifying the effect of library batch on extracellular RNA sequencing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Addressing Fairness, Bias, and Appropriate Use of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Global Health.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2020Article
- Knowledge Generation with Rule Induction in Cancer Omics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationIn contemporary biological experiments, bias, which interferes with the measurements, requires attentive processing. Important sources of bias in high-throughput biological experiments are batch effects and diverse methods towards removal of batch effects have been established. These include various normalization techniques, yet many require knowledge on the number of batches and assignment of samples to batches. Only few can deal with the problem of identification of batch effect of unknown structure. For this reason, an original batch identification algorithm through dynamical programming is introduced for omics data that may be sorted on a timescale.
resultsBatchI algorithm is based on partitioning a series of high-throughput experiment samples into sub-series corresponding to estimated batches. The dynamic programming method is used for splitting data with maximal dispersion between batches, while maintaining minimal within batch dispersion. The procedure has been tested on a number of available datasets with and without prior information about batch partitioning. Datasets with a priori identified batches have been split accordingly, measured with weighted average Dice Index. Batch effect correction is justified by higher intra-group correlation. In the blank datasets, identified batch divisions lead to improvement of parameters and quality of biological information, shown by literature study and Information Content. The outcome of the algorithm serves as a starting point for correction methods. It has been demonstrated that omitting the essential step of batch effect control may lead to waste of valuable potential discoveries. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The implementation is available within the BatchI R package at http://zaed.aei.polsl.pl/index.php/pl/111-software. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.