Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30357412›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019

BatchI: Batch effect Identification in high-throughput screening data using a dynamic programming algorithm.

Anna Papiez, Michal Marczyk, Joanna Polanska, Andrzej Polanski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Perspectives for better batch effect correction in mass-spectrometry-based proteomics.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Translational precision medicine: an industry perspective.Journal of translational medicine · 2021
    Review
  11. Biological Perspectives of RNA-Sequencing Experimental Design.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Clarifying the effect of library batch on extracellular RNA sequencing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Knowledge Generation with Rule Induction in Cancer Omics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna PapiezInstitute of Automatic Control, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland.
Michal MarczykInstitute of Automatic Control, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland.
Joanna PolanskaInstitute of Automatic Control, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland.
Andrzej PolanskiInstitute of Informatics, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationIn contemporary biological experiments, bias, which interferes with the measurements, requires attentive processing. Important sources of bias in high-throughput biological experiments are batch effects and diverse methods towards removal of batch effects have been established. These include various normalization techniques, yet many require knowledge on the number of batches and assignment of samples to batches. Only few can deal with the problem of identification of batch effect of unknown structure. For this reason, an original batch identification algorithm through dynamical programming is introduced for omics data that may be sorted on a timescale.

resultsBatchI algorithm is based on partitioning a series of high-throughput experiment samples into sub-series corresponding to estimated batches. The dynamic programming method is used for splitting data with maximal dispersion between batches, while maintaining minimal within batch dispersion. The procedure has been tested on a number of available datasets with and without prior information about batch partitioning. Datasets with a priori identified batches have been split accordingly, measured with weighted average Dice Index. Batch effect correction is justified by higher intra-group correlation. In the blank datasets, identified batch divisions lead to improvement of parameters and quality of biological information, shown by literature study and Information Content. The outcome of the algorithm serves as a starting point for correction methods. It has been demonstrated that omitting the essential step of batch effect control may lead to waste of valuable potential discoveries. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The implementation is available within the BatchI R package at http://zaed.aei.polsl.pl/index.php/pl/111-software. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID30357412
PMCPMC6546123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.