Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2019
An adaptive population enrichment phase III trial of TRC105 and pazopanib versus pazopanib alone in patients with advanced angiosarcoma (TAPPAS trial).
Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02979899 (A Randomized Phase 3 Trial of TRC105 and Pazopanib Versus Pazopanib Alone in Patients With Advanced Angiosarcoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Phase 3 Trial of TRC105 and Pazopanib Versus Pazopanib Alone in Patients With Advanced Angiosarcoma (TAPPAS)
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of randomised controlled trials with adaptive and traditional group sequential designs - applications in cardiovascular clinical trials.BMC medical research methodology · 2023Pooled it
- Adaptive versus fixed designs in confirmatory clinical trials: centering the choice on ethics.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2026Article
- Article
- Past, present, and future of Phase 3 vaccine trial design: rethinking statistics for the 21st century.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2025Review
- Progress in immune microenvironment, immunotherapy and prognostic biomarkers in pediatric osteosarcoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Use of Seamless Study Designs in Oncology Clinical Development- A Survey Conducted by IDSWG Oncology Sub-team.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2024Article
- Sensitivity Analyses of Clinical Trial Designs: Selecting Scenarios and Summarizing Operating Characteristics.The American statistician · 2024Article
- Current understanding of angiosarcoma: disease biology and evolving treatment.Archives of craniofacial surgery · 2023Article
- The Midwest Sarcoma Trials Partnership: Bridging Academic and Community Networks in a Collaborative Approach to Sarcoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Antagonizing CD105 and androgen receptor to target stromal-epithelial interactions for clinical benefit.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2023Article
- Retrospective study of efficacy and adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors in 22 xeroderma pigmentosum patients with metastatic or unresectable cancers.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Recent innovations in adaptive trial designs: A review of design opportunities in translational research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Review
- Genetic Alterations and Deregulation of Hippo Pathway as a Pathogenetic Mechanism in Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma.Cancers · 2022Review
- Article
- High-precision tumor resection down to few-cell level guided by NIR-IIb molecular fluorescence imaging.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Curcuminoids Inhibit Angiogenic Behaviors of Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells via Endoglin/Smad1 Signaling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Colorectal liver metastasis: molecular mechanism and interventional therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2022Review
- Management of Cutaneous Angiosarcoma: an Update Review.Current treatment options in oncology · 2022Review
- Case Report: Complete Response to Antiangiogenesis and Immune Checkpoint Blockade in an Unresectable MMR-Deficient Leiomyosarcoma Harboring Biallelic Loss of PTEN.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Imaging features of primary sites and metastatic patterns of angiosarcoma.Insights into imaging · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Major challenges in clinical trials of ultra-orphan oncology diseases include limited patient availability and paucity of reliable prior data for estimating the treatment effect and, therefore, determining optimal sample size. Angiosarcoma (AS), a particularly aggressive form of soft tissue sarcoma with an incidence of about 2000 cases per year in the United States and Europe is poorly addressed by current systemic therapies. Pazopanib, an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) is approved for the treatment of AS, with modest benefit. TRC105 (carotuximab) is a monoclonal antibody to endoglin, an essential angiogenic target highly expressed on proliferating endothelium and both tumor vessels and tumor cells in AS, that has the potential to complement VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In a phase I/II study of soft tissue sarcoma, TRC105 combined safely with pazopanib and the combination demonstrated durable complete responses and encouraging progression-free survival (PFS). In addition, there was a suggestion of superior benefit in patients with cutaneous lesions versus those with the non-cutaneous lesions. Patients and methods: This article describes the design of a recently initiated phase III trial of TRC105 And Pazopanib versus Pazopanib alone in patients with advanced AngioSarcoma (TAPPAS trial). Given the ultra-orphan status of the disease and the paucity of reliable prior data on PFS or overall survival (end points required for regulatory approval as a pivotal trial), an adaptive design incorporating population enrichment and sample size re-estimation was implemented. The design incorporated regulatory input from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency and proceeded following special protocol assessment designation by the FDA. Conclusions: It is shown that the benefit of the adaptive design as compared with a conventional single-look design arises from the learning and subsequent improvements in power that occur after an unblinded analysis of interim data. Registered on Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02979899.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.