ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2018
Heterogeneous network embedding for identifying symptom candidate genes.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- PrescDRL: deep reinforcement learning for herbal prescription planning in treatment of chronic diseases.Chinese medicine · 2024Article
- KDGene: knowledge graph completion for disease gene prediction using interactional tensor decomposition.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Network medicine framework reveals generic herb-symptom effectiveness of traditional Chinese medicine.Science advances · 2023Article
- Hetnet connectivity search provides rapid insights into how two biomedical entities are related.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Hetnet connectivity search provides rapid insights into how biomedical entities are related.GigaScience · 2022Article
- Network-Based Methods for Approaching Human Pathologies from a Phenotypic Point of View.Genes · 2022Review
- Diversity and molecular network patterns of symptom phenotypes.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2021Article
- Identification of Hypertension Subgroups through Topological Analysis of Symptom-Based Patient Similarity.Chinese journal of integrative medicine · 2021Article
- A network-based machine-learning framework to identify both functional modules and disease genes.Human genetics · 2021Article
- A New Approach of Fatigue Classification Based on Data of Tongue and Pulse With Machine Learning.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- Symptom Distribution Regularity of Insomnia: Network and Spectral Clustering Analysis.JMIR medical informatics · 2020Article
- Constructing knowledge graphs and their biomedical applications.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020Review
- Herb Target Prediction Based on Representation Learning of Symptom related Heterogeneous Network.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Investigating the molecular mechanisms of symptoms is a vital task in precision medicine to refine disease taxonomy and improve the personalized management of chronic diseases. Although there are abundant experimental studies and computational efforts to obtain the candidate genes of diseases, the identification of symptom genes is rarely addressed. We curated a high-quality benchmark dataset of symptom-gene associations and proposed a heterogeneous network embedding for identifying symptom genes. Methods: We proposed a heterogeneous network embedding representation algorithm, which constructed a heterogeneous symptom-related network that integrated symptom-related associations and applied an embedding representation algorithm to obtain the low-dimensional vector representation of nodes. By measuring the relevance between symptoms and genes via calculating the similarities of their vectors, the candidate genes of given symptoms can be obtained. Results: A benchmark dataset of 18 270 symptom-gene associations between 505 symptoms and 4549 genes was curated. We compared our method to baseline algorithms (FSGER and PRINCE). The experimental results indicated our algorithm achieved a significant improvement over the state-of-the-art method, with precision and recall improved by 66.80% (0.844 vs 0.506) and 53.96% (0.311 vs 0.202), respectively, for TOP@3 and association precision improved by 37.71% (0.723 vs 0.525) over the PRINCE. Conclusions: The experimental validation of the algorithms and the literature validation of typical symptoms indicated our method achieved excellent performance. Hence, we curated a prediction dataset of 17 479 symptom-candidate genes. The benchmark and prediction datasets have the potential to promote investigations of the molecular mechanisms of symptoms and provide candidate genes for validation in experimental settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.