Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30357378›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2018

Heterogeneous network embedding for identifying symptom candidate genes.

Kuo Yang, Ning Wang, Guangming Liu, Ruyu Wang, Jian Yu, Runshun Zhang, Jianxin Chen, Xuezhong Zhou

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Diversity and molecular network patterns of symptom phenotypes.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Constructing knowledge graphs and their biomedical applications.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kuo YangSchool of Computer and Information Technology and Beijing Key Laboratory of Traffic Data Analysis and Mining, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China.
Ning WangSchool of Computer and Information Technology and Beijing Key Laboratory of Traffic Data Analysis and Mining, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China.
Guangming LiuSchool of Computer and Information Technology and Beijing Key Laboratory of Traffic Data Analysis and Mining, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China.
Ruyu WangSchool of Computer and Information Technology and Beijing Key Laboratory of Traffic Data Analysis and Mining, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China.
Jian YuSchool of Computer and Information Technology and Beijing Key Laboratory of Traffic Data Analysis and Mining, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China.
Runshun ZhangGuanganmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jianxin ChenBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Xuezhong ZhouSchool of Computer and Information Technology and Beijing Key Laboratory of Traffic Data Analysis and Mining, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China.
Beijing Jiaotong University · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNBeijing University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Investigating the molecular mechanisms of symptoms is a vital task in precision medicine to refine disease taxonomy and improve the personalized management of chronic diseases. Although there are abundant experimental studies and computational efforts to obtain the candidate genes of diseases, the identification of symptom genes is rarely addressed. We curated a high-quality benchmark dataset of symptom-gene associations and proposed a heterogeneous network embedding for identifying symptom genes. Methods: We proposed a heterogeneous network embedding representation algorithm, which constructed a heterogeneous symptom-related network that integrated symptom-related associations and applied an embedding representation algorithm to obtain the low-dimensional vector representation of nodes. By measuring the relevance between symptoms and genes via calculating the similarities of their vectors, the candidate genes of given symptoms can be obtained. Results: A benchmark dataset of 18 270 symptom-gene associations between 505 symptoms and 4549 genes was curated. We compared our method to baseline algorithms (FSGER and PRINCE). The experimental results indicated our algorithm achieved a significant improvement over the state-of-the-art method, with precision and recall improved by 66.80% (0.844 vs 0.506) and 53.96% (0.311 vs 0.202), respectively, for TOP@3 and association precision improved by 37.71% (0.723 vs 0.525) over the PRINCE. Conclusions: The experimental validation of the algorithms and the literature validation of typical symptoms indicated our method achieved excellent performance. Hence, we curated a prediction dataset of 17 479 symptom-candidate genes. The benchmark and prediction datasets have the potential to promote investigations of the molecular mechanisms of symptoms and provide candidate genes for validation in experimental settings.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGene Regulatory NetworksComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticDatasets as TopicDiseaseHumansSymptom Assessment

Identifiers

PMID30357378
PMCPMC7646926
OpenAlexW2898593560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.