Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30357008›Full record

ArticleJournal of extracellular vesicles2018

Precipitation with polyethylene glycol followed by washing and pelleting by ultracentrifugation enriches extracellular vesicles from tissue culture supernatants in small and large scales.

Anna-Kristin Ludwig, Kyra De Miroschedji, Thorsten R Doeppner, Verena Börger, Johannes Ruesing, Vera Rebmann, Stephan Durst, Sören Jansen, Michel Bremer, Elmar Behrmann and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of extracellular vesicles, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 179 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
179citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

179 citing papers in PubMed, 272 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

119 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Anna-Kristin LudwigInstitute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Kyra De MiroschedjiInstitute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Thorsten R DoeppnerInstitute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Verena BörgerInstitute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Johannes RuesingInorganic Chemistry and Center for Nanointegration Duisburg-Essen (CeNIDE), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Vera RebmannInstitute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Stephan DurstInstitute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Sören JansenInstitute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Michel BremerInstitute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Elmar BehrmannDepartment of Structural Biology, Max-Planck-Institute for Physiology, Dortmund, Germany.
Bernhard B SingerInstitute of Anatomy, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Holger JastrowInstitute of Anatomy, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Jan Dominik KuhlmannDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Fouzi El MagraouiBiomedical Research, Human Brain Proteomics II, Leibniz-Institut für Analytische Wissenschaften-ISAS, Dortmund, Germany.
Helmut E MeyerBiomedical Research, Human Brain Proteomics II, Leibniz-Institut für Analytische Wissenschaften-ISAS, Dortmund, Germany.
Dirk M HermannDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Bertram OpalkaDepartment of Hematology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Stefan RaunserDepartment of Structural Biology, Max-Planck-Institute for Physiology, Dortmund, Germany.
Matthias EppleInorganic Chemistry and Center for Nanointegration Duisburg-Essen (CeNIDE), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Peter A HornInstitute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Bernd GiebelInstitute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
University of Duisburg-Essen · DELeibniz Institute for Analytical Sciences - ISAS · DEEssen University Hospital · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMax Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology · DENational Center for Tumor Diseases · DEUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) provide a complex means of intercellular signalling between cells at local and distant sites, both within and between different organs. According to their cell-type specific signatures, EVs can function as a novel class of biomarkers for a variety of diseases, and can be used as drug-delivery vehicles. Furthermore, EVs from certain cell types exert beneficial effects in regenerative medicine and for immune modulation. Several techniques are available to harvest EVs from various body fluids or cell culture supernatants. Classically, differential centrifugation, density gradient centrifugation, size-exclusion chromatography and immunocapturing-based methods are used to harvest EVs from EV-containing liquids. Owing to limitations in the scalability of any of these methods, we designed and optimised a polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based precipitation method to enrich EVs from cell culture supernatants. We demonstrate the reproducibility and scalability of this method and compared its efficacy with more classical EV-harvesting methods. We show that washing of the PEG pellet and the re-precipitation by ultracentrifugation remove a huge proportion of PEG co-precipitated molecules such as bovine serum albumine (BSA). However, supported by the results of the size exclusion chromatography, which revealed a higher purity in terms of particles per milligram protein of the obtained EV samples, PEG-prepared EV samples most likely still contain a certain percentage of other non-EV associated molecules. Since PEG-enriched EVs revealed the same therapeutic activity in an ischemic stroke model than corresponding cells, it is unlikely that such co-purified molecules negatively affect the functional properties of obtained EV samples. In summary, maybe not being the purification method of choice if molecular profiling of pure EV samples is intended, the optimised PEG protocol is a scalable and reproducible method, which can easily be adopted by laboratories equipped with an ultracentrifuge to enrich for functional active EVs.

Indexed as

CD63Exosomesextracellular vesiclesmicrovesiclesPEG

Identifiers

PMID30357008
PMCPMC6197019
OpenAlexW2897903541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.